the first one was terrible

why? the first one was so incomprehensibly horrible.

This is so far the worst movie Ive seen this year next to The Unborn.

Awful film. I hadn't been so bored watching a movie in a theater in a long time.

Everyone says the first film was so "terrible"...yet nobody says why? Is it because it's trendy to rip on PG-13 horror? Personally, I thought it was well done. Much better than other supposed "based on a true story" haunted house films.

Drag Me To Hell was awesome.

It has nothing to do with the PG-13 rating. I loved Drag Me To Hell. I also enjoyed The Grudge, The Ring, and Dark Water. But it's the story itself that ruins it. Boy has disease, boy takes medicine and hallucinates. The trailer alone bored me.

Man, the medicine was not making him hallucinate. Him seeing all those ghosts was not because of medicine, it was because the house was HAUNTED! Hence the name of the movie and the fact that it was based on true events. The movie was great, you all must not know a good movie if knocked on your door and scared the shit out of you. Btw, dark water sucks.

What's the point? new family in a different house and state? doesn't sound interesting.

Thanks for the video, but you forgot the last part! I had to go on YouTube to find it. I think that will be an awesome movie, cause the discovery channel program is freaking me out!

The concept of making these ghost movies is enough to want to open purgatory and stuff the idea in there so it can never bother people again. There are too many lame ghost movies that just need to go away!!!!

Umm the first one was alright but it was basically just a watered down version of Amityville Horror. I don't really need a sequel let alone TWO sequels. Lionsgate you disappoint me. Make MBV 2 or Hostel 3.

i loved the original thought it was brilliant so the prospect of two sequels sounds brilliant to me

yeah i thought "Connecticut" was good. but it wasn't scary at all. i remember seeing "Georgia" on Unsolved Mysteries and "A Haunting" and I remember it creeped the hell outta me. i never saw the "New York" one.

I didn't see HIC. It looked like shit to me. Just a PG-13 cash-in with that whole "based on a true story" tagline. A 2 and 3 is just a terrible idea.

I loved the trailer; however I was very much disappointed with the film for it was boring, hard to believe, and they didn’t stay true to the characters or “REAL” hauntings. If they do the trilogy based off of the Discovery Channel’s show “A Haunting in _______” wouldn’t be a bad idea as long as each one is a new story with no reference to the previous film. They are all on youtube if anyone wants to watch them, just search “A Haunting in.” I would give the next movie a chance.

I like Penguins!!

HiC was one of few PG-13 movies that didn't feel watered-down in the gore department because it didn't really require much. It was much better than The Unborn and most other recent PG-13 horrors like The Grudge 1-2, Boogeyman, etc. Too bad concering the Ouija board as Michael Bay could have used that plot for his upcoming movie based on the Hasbro toy.

This film was the same thing over and over again. It was very boring. Not because of it's rating because of it's script. The cast was good with Virginia Madsen and the guy who played her son but the whole thing all seemed like we'd seen it before and better.

Dark Water and The Grudge were horrible. I wasn't a huge fan of The Ring either. The sense of realism that HIC had was the bast part about it. I will be watching the sequels at the theater for sure. People who didn't even watch the first one are ripping sequels. Thats just ricockulous.

A Haunting In Georgia is something I saw on Discovery Channel and I think they can pull it off. A Haunting In New York kinda sounds just like Haunting In Connecticut.

when i first saw sequel, i was like no! it ended perfectly! and then i kept reading and i was like thank god. i loved HIC i screamed once or twice and matt was freakin hott. i think they can pull off haunting in georgia and new york. ill just have to wait and see.