Connect with us

Exclusives

Interview with Gareth Edwards, Director of the Most Impressive Indie of the Year, ‘Monsters’

Published

on

Being released by Magnet on October 29th (but now available on iTunes, Amazon, PS3, Xbox Live, On-Demand!), director Gareth Edward’s Monsters is an ultra-low budget sci-fi/drama with elements of horror that has gotten lots of buzz since it debuted Stateside at this year’s SXSW and LA Film Festival. B-D’s Chris Eggertsen sat down with Edwards to discuss the film’s rather misleading marketing campaign, how he created the look of the creatures, and whether he’s interested in ever directing a straight-up horror film. See inside for the entire interview.
Make no mistake – director Gareth Edward’s ultra-low budget (like, $15K low budget) second feature Monsters, which debuted at this year’s LA Film Festival to a large amount of buzz, is not your typical monster movie. Though it’s more or less being marketed in the Cloverfield vein, unlike that film it’s a hard movie to pin down. Sure, it has elements of horror, but it also has elements of sci-fi, and romance, and road movie. Ultimately, Monsters challenges perceptions of just what a “genre” movie is, and it’s certainly not a film that fits comfortably within the constraints of the Hollywood marketing machine. The blonde-haired, blue-eyed Brit was open and forthright when discussing this fact with me at the offices of his Hollywood P.R. firm, not to mention a warm and engaging presence who so far seems grounded and essentially ego-less in the wake of his astonishing good fortune. After all, when you make a film for $15,000 and it’s as hyped up as Monsters is, it’s pretty much already a success.

BLOODY DISGUSTING: Monsters is definitely being marketed as a horror film, like Cloverfield or another more traditional monster movie, but that’s not really what I feel the film is. So I just wanted to get your take on how it’s being advertised.

GARETH EDWARDS: I don’t envy them [meaning the studio]. It’s funny, because when you start to make a film people say, `Why is your film different? We’re not gonna give you money unless you tell us why it’s different.’ So you make something different, and at the end of making the film they say, `Oh my god, what have you done? You’ve made something different. How can we sell this? It has to fit in a box. It can’t fit in two boxes, it’s got to go in one.’ I think films don’t have to fit in a box, but I think the marketing does.

And I’m guilty of this, like there are quite a few recent films that I just didn’t see at the cinema that are apparently pretty good. And people go, `Gareth it’s really good, you’ve gotta go see it!’ And I go, `eh, I don’t wanna.’ [And they’re] like, `why not?’ And I always end up going, `I just don’t know what it is.’ I won’t name the films because it’s probably unfair, but you go, `Is it a comedy? Is it a superhero movie? What is it?’ And they’re going, `Well it’s all of those things and none of them, and it’s something on its own’…

So what I think has to happen is, for better or for worse, you have to say, `This is what our film is.’ And if you can’t do it justice in a poster or in a trailer, then you have to pick an element of the film. And I think it came down to a choice with the distributors and the sales companies…[and] I think if they’d gone for a love story angle, I think it would’ve misrepresented the film a lot. I think the thing that probably represents it best is probably a road movie with a relationship at the heart of it, set in a world with monsters. It’s like someone said the other day, they saw it and said, `Were you trying to make a love story for boys or a monster movie for girls?’ And I sort of went, `Actually I was trying to make a road movie for aliens.’ So I think I completely fucked it up.

BD: I think what I’m getting at is, are you afraid people are going to see the trailer and feel misled once they go and see the actual film and realize it’s not truly a horror movie?

I’m as much afraid of that as I am afraid that people won’t go see it… the choice comes down to, do you have some people angry because they saw it and it wasn’t what they were expecting, or do you have people angry with you because they never saw it because they didn’t realize what the hell it was? If you ask any sales person they’ll say it’s better to have people see it and be angry with you than to have people not see it and be angry with you…

I find the hardest question in an interview is `what’s your film about?’ Because it’s like, `God, I don’t know.’ Cause it took me two years to figure out what it was about…to me sitting here, I kind of can’t explain it. Not because it’s amazing or anything, but just because it is a mix of things…it’s a very important lesson if I ever get to make another film in that [you should] think straight-away before you even start with the script, think of the poster, think of the trailer. Think of all the things that are people’s first exposure to it. And what are they? Because you can end up like we are now in this situation where it’s really hard to do it justice.

I’m really keeping my fingers crossed that whatever anyone goes in expecting, hopefully some of them come out having really enjoyed it for what it is and recommend it to other people, and it can have a life like that…it’s funny though, cause I go into the blockbuster movies, the Hollywood movies, and I have an expectation and…I’m always disappointed for the complete opposite reason which is, `I didn’t give a shit about the characters, I could totally predict the story, [it had] CGI just for the sake of it’…and for some reason that’s completely tolerated. It’s allowed. But if you do it the opposite, which is it’s more about the characters, and their journey, and not so much about the spectacle and the CGI, it’s like you commit the biggest crime against cinema…it’s the thing everyone whines about when they go and see one of those other [films]. So you can’t win. It’s like politics, you know? I understand how Obama must feel now.

There’s no such film that pleases everyone. Look at IMDB. There’s no ten out of ten [in the user ratings]…you end up getting ratings on IMDB, and you think `ok, I wonder what that means?’ I looked at some great movies, and I looked at `Jaws’, and I might get this wrong, [but] I think it’s an 8.3. I might have that wrong. And I’m just sitting there [thinking], `Who the fuck did not vote 10 on that movie? What was your problem with it? Where did it screw up?’ It’s like perfection, you know, near enough…I think the problem is there’s not enough CGI in it, and it was [about] the characters more than the shark.

BD: Were you influenced by any classic giant movie monsters when you created the alien creatures?

The biggest influence was the idea of where they came from, which is…I wanted a realistic premise, and if you ask any scientist where the most likely place of alien life is in the solar system, they’ll tell you that there’s a moon outside of Jupiter called Europa. It’s got an icy surface, and it’s cracked, and it’s changing. And it means that they basically know that underneath there must be a liquid ocean. And the only way that can work is having a volcanic core…so that’s exactly the same conditions that started life on Earth. We didn’t start on the surface, we started on the bottom of the ocean.

So NASA was planning a mission to go and have a look, and so in my movie they bring that sample back and that’s the beginning of everything going wrong. So to me, they’re from the bottom of the ocean. So I looked at crabs and octopuses, and bio-luminescence. And it kind of took awhile to arrive at something I was happy with in that it’s very easy to stick different animals together and you get a real mess…so that’s where that’s from.

BD: One thing I noticed is that the sound effects are used very effectively when the creatures aren’t on screen, when you just hear them. I was wondering how you created those sound effects, and what was your inspiration for how the creatures would sound?

They’re from the bottom of the ocean so I was thinking like whale song, and dolphin clicks, and eco-location, and then [the sound designer] just literally went away and did everything. I virtually had no role in that…he’s brilliant, his name’s Jurgen [Funk].

What I will say is that scene where they go up to the jungle and they hear those noises, that wasn’t in the script or anything. What happened was, we were waiting for lunch in the boat and we had about half an hour, 45 minutes to kill. So we thought, `let’s film some extra scenes…let’s just pull in, pretend we’re getting gas, and see what happens. Like, Sam [the female character played by Whitney Able] can pretend she needs to use the loo or something.’

And the actors are looking at me like, `What the fucking point is this, can’t we just have a rest?’ And I was like, `Come on, let’s just see what happens.’ And so we did the scene, and I don’t know why, I just felt like something was gonna happen. So we started filming, and in the middle of the scene these howler monkeys start screaming. And I don’t know if you’ve ever heard a howler monkey, but it’s like dipping a baby in molten oil or something. And everyone knows how that sounds, right? I haven’t done it in awhile, I haven’t done it since I was a teenager. [Laughs]

So this amazing sound stuff was happening, and it was really scary. And some of the reactions are in the film, like `what the fuck’s that?’ And it was like `Great, why didn’t I think of this? We have to have a scene that’s all about sound and not seeing it.’ So then we just elaborated on that and got some of the guys with the guns to pretend they were hearing it too.

BD: So what’s up next for you?

All I can say is I do have a development deal and it will be science fiction…the thing I’m trying to write is science fiction, whether I do that next or not depends on everyone [else]…it is more ambitious than `Monsters’, but it’s not a monster movie. That’s all I’m really allowed to say.

BD: Will you ever do a straight-up horror movie?

I’m actually a fan of horror. I’m ten thousand times more a fan of horror than I am of a love story. It was like `gosh, if I’m gonna do a love story I wanna do one in an environment that would interest me’…would I do a horror? Yes, for sure. And I don’t consider this film a horror really. It has elements here and there…and I think there’s a sort of tension and atmosphere a lot in the film that just feels awkward. But it’s not a horror movie. But yeah, sure.

BD: So are you aiming to do a big-budget Hollywood film at some point?

The kid in me is like `yeah, absolutely’. That’s the whole dream. And now the adult is saying `well, things have changed’…you don’t necessarily need to do that anymore. I think the problem is that when you have loads of money, you also have loads of obligation to have a big successful film, which means you then have an obligation to appeal to a wide range of people. And that means you have to play it a bit safer…and obviously there’s lots of examples of people who didn’t [play it safe] and had success. But there’s just as many examples of people who didn’t and have a failure…

So I would prefer to trade lots of money for…because why do you want money, anyway? The only reason I’d want money is to have freedom to do what I want, and what I want to do is make good films. So I would trade the money to create the freedom to make a good film. And if that means not having the money and having a small crew and doing things the way you want to do them, as [hard] as it is, cause I really do want to go and make those big Hollywood movies.

At this stage, anyway, I’d keep it lower budget and try and do something I really want to see. It’s kind of like having a wedding and somebody goes to your wedding and says, `Oh, I really loved your wedding, it was great. We’re getting married in six months, could you do our wedding?’ It’s like, well if the wedding was any good, it’s because I was completely in love with the person. And you can’t be a wedding for hire, you know what I mean? You’ve gotta really love what it is you’re doing, and so for me at the moment it feels like it’s gotta be an idea generated by me that I really, really wanna do. Two years is such a traumatic amount of time to do a movie…you’ve gotta really, really wanna do it…you’ve gotta be really passionate about it from the start. It’s hard for someone to give you something [that you didn’t write the script for] and feel that kind of passion. It’s very rare.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Exclusives

‘Tarot’ Filmmakers Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg on Practical Creature Effects and ‘Insidious’ Inspirations

Published

on

Tarot horror movie exclusive images

An evil curse gets awakened in Screen Gems horror movie Tarot when a group of friends recklessly ignore a sacred rule: never use someone else’s deck. Writers/Directors Spenser Cohen & Anna Halberg unleash a variety of Tarot card-inspired entities on the group through practical effects, and create an unexpected connection to Insidious along the way.

The film comes exclusively to movie theaters on May 3, 2024.

Bloody Disgusting spoke with Cohen and Halberg ahead of Tarot‘s release, where the pair shared more about the film’s practical effects-driven horrors and revealed how Tarot drew from Insidious in a specific way.

To start, though, the filmmakers reveal just how closely their horror movie sticks to the source novel Horrorscope by Nicholas AdamsThe short answer is, well, it doesn’t at all!

Cohen explains, “It’s so different. We never even read the book and took nothing from the book. The only thingthe studio had a title that they liked, and so that’s why there was an association. Then we changed the title. So, now there’s literally zero connection to the book.

“Sony had come to us wanting to make a horror movie about astrology, but there’s nothing that’s inherently scary to us about Zodiac signs. So, we came up with the idea of combining tarot readings and tarot cards with astrology, and that’s what ended up becoming the movie. There’s such incredible iconography in these cards that we really had a plethora of amazing characters to choose from,” Halberg adds.

Cast of Tarot

Adain Bradley ‘Grant’ and Jacob Batalon ‘Paxton’ in Screen Gems TAROT

With a group of seven friends, expect to see their fates sealed by a number of cards. In other words, expect to see a wide variety of Tarot-inspired creatures tormenting the protagonists. The filmmakers stressed the importance of practical effects for their creatures.

Cohen tells us, “From the get-go, we said every creature is going to be practical. We were thinking of [David] Cronenberg, of Alien and The Thing, and we want our actors responding to real things, not a tennis ball. It always just looks better. You get better performances. With the designs themselves, if you look at the tarot cards and these specific characters, there’s nothing inherently terrifying about them, even though we associate the cards with being supernatural and terrifying. And [it’s] why we partnered with Trevor [Henderson]who was the only designer we met with. We were like, this is our guy because he has this ability to make the familiar feel unnatural.

“His designs are really grounded. I am sure you’ve seen a lot of his stuff where it’s like a hallway, and there’s something there, and something’s off about it, but it really feels like it’s in the space. We knew that he has a special brain for creating unique creatures, and he hadn’t done a movie, which is just shocking to us. Then, we knew that in order to pull that off, we would need a design team with equal skill. That was Dan Martin and his amazing team who worked hand in hand with Trevor to bring those to life.”

Tarot horror movie

Larsen Thompson ‘Elise’ in Screen Gems TAROT

Great designs and practical effects are one thing, but it also falls to the performers to infuse these monsters with personality to make them memorable. That was also at the forefront of the filmmakers’ minds.

In order for the creatures to translate, underneath all the prosthetics, you have to have great actors,” Cohen confirms. “We met with a lot of people. We were looking for people who were talking to us about the psychology and the movement and how they could move in a way that we hadn’t seen before or incorporate dance. We were looking for those outliers, and basically, everyone we hired approached the part as if there were no makeup or prosthetics. It’s like, ‘I am the Magician, so this is what I want to do. I’m going to have a limp. My body’s going to do this. I feel like my head is hunched.’ And we would watch these actors just embody these roles. It was really just picking great people, honestly. It’s hard to act through prosthetics and create emotion and fear and other things. You have to have an incredible control to be able to do that.”

Halberg elaborates,” Even though we enhanced some of the creatures with visual effects, we didn’t want to rely on that. So we needed people, like Spenser said, who each brought their own unique feel to these characters. They were just as important as all of the other actors in the movie and are so crucial to making sure that these sequences are scary and believable.”

Tarot The Hanged Man - Tarot Trailer Breakdown

Humberly González ‘Madeline’ in Screen Gems TAROT

One of the many Tarot creatures in the film is the Magician, who comes with an original song by the film’s composer, Joseph Bishara. While Bishara has delivered no shortage of great contemporary horror scores, including The Conjuring and Malignant, horror fans are likely more familiar with Bishara as the Lipstick Demon in the Insidious franchise. Cohen and Halberg can be counted among Insidious fans, so much so that they wanted an original song from the Lipstick Demon himself.

They explain, “We actually, in prep, we called Joe, and we said, ‘Hey, we’re going to do some kind of an old-timey song there.’ We knew something creepy, very Shining-esque. Then we had the idea to do a song called ‘I Saw You’ to be a pun on that whole thing. And actually use saws as the instrument. We found these YouTube videos, and our DP, I think, Elie [Smolkin] had found these videos of someone playing a saw. We were like, that’s terrifying.

“So we called Joeand we said, ‘You know Tiptoe through the Tulips, how that’s like in Insidious?’ That’s the thing you leave the theater thinking about, and it gets under your skin. We were like, ‘Can you do that for us with an original song?’ He said yes. What you hear in the movie is basically what he played for us the first time. He was just like, ‘I have an idea. I’ll talk to you guys in a week.’ And then that was what we heard, and it was amazing.”

With so many entities and horror sequences, Halberg can’t pick a favorite. Instead, she offers one last tease, “I hope people come away with the realization that each of the sequences is so unique and different, and that each of the creatures is so special because we took a lot of time trying to craft each of these kills or scares to be their own thing and to feel different.

“Hopefully everybody can choose their own favorite.”

Tarot poster

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading