Need an Account? Sign Up
 


Neve Campbell Effs Up New 'Scream' Trilogy Plans?
Thursday, June 18, 2009


By: MrDisgusting
Share Comments

Neve Campbell, who played Sidney Prescott ("Sid") in the first three Scream films, has thrown a kink in the wheel of the forthcoming new trilogy. Writer Kevin Williamson updated his Twitter account with some disheartening news. "Trying to figure out a Sid-less scenario. She won't do it. This sucks," he writes. While Neve was offered a cameo role, the new story was to follow a group of new teenagers. If Williamson's plan was to have Sidney be the new killer, we're far ahead of you buddy. That's dumb anyways. Courteney Cox and David Arquette are both still said to be returning.

"Hi, this is Sidney, super bitch, who is this?"

Neve Campbell

Source: Kevin Williamson Bookmark and Share

Previous Story Print Story Send to a Friend Next Story


Horror_Guy
10:08pm, June 18, 2009

Uhg. God.


mjslawrence
10:25pm, June 18, 2009

Because she's got such a booming career for herself...(rolls eyes)


slasher_12
10:28pm, June 18, 2009

I'm all for Rose McGowan to replace her=)


Avigrus
10:31pm, June 18, 2009

What? All she wants to do is sappy art-romance movies... She would've been the saving grace of this idea, now its going to be the "American Pie - Band Camp" of the horror world.


RickyG
10:34pm, June 18, 2009

i want her back but not in a cemo i need all the old charcters to be leading roles ughhh. I just watch Scream 1-3 and omg i want them as leading roles.


RickyG
10:34pm, June 18, 2009

i want her back but not in a cemo i need all the old charcters to be leading roles ughhh. I just watch Scream 1-3 and omg i want them as leading roles.


Rampage14
10:35pm, June 18, 2009

Williamson should just leave the idea of rebooting Scream alone. Honestly he was lucky to get 2 sequels when he did. Scream really should have been a stand alone film, w/o any sequels. The reason Scream was such a hit was because it was the only movie to target the slasher genre's mishaps/ shortcomings while still actually adding a new hip spin on the genre; with killers that openly spoke to their victims & ran/fall while in pursuit. Plus at that time the slasher movement had fizzled off. Right now it's still all bout Torture Porn movies. This is why I Think both Halloween & Friday the 13th missed their mark. Both these reboots were missing excess blood/gore; which is what you know your going to get the w/ Saw or Hostel franchises. I think that's why many not all fans, prefered The Texas Chainsaw reboot. TCM, was able in my opinion, to combine the aspects of traditional slasher with the torture, blood & gore of the newwave 'gorno'. Bottomline I'm not sure it's the right time for Scream's reboot!


The_Bark
10:37pm, June 18, 2009

Here Kevin, I'll be nice and give you some help: Sidney has lived an effed up life since we last saw her in Scream 3, so much so that she kills herself. One year later, people start dying again. Is it the father who's finally snapped? Or is it her boyfriend, who's pissed at the world and what it did to her. Or... Is it Courtney Cox who's suffered from a turn of events over the last 10 years, many feeling her books causing their relationship to sour again to the point Courtney's cash-cow dried up to the point where maybe Sidney didn't kill herself at all... Maybe she was murdered, Courtney "stumbling" upon evidence a year later suggesting so that spurs a renewed interest, which of course, spurs more deaths. The biggest problem is there haven't been any good slasher flicks in the last 10 or so years to riff on. Good luck Kevin...


The_Bark
10:40pm, June 18, 2009

P.S. Scream 2 + 3, much like Matrix 2 + 3, are the only sequels I've seen that have actually lowered my opinion of the original when viewing them as a body of work. Pretty hard to do, too... But yes, it should have been a stand alone film. Having the original two guys subsequently viewed as nothing more than "pawns" in the later films diminished them.


RickyG
10:44pm, June 18, 2009

LEADIN ROLES I love this movie was the first horror movie for me when i was 4.( that could remember it) I was soo happy for the ending but y make a new one to mass it up. Leading roles


Skratchy
10:49pm, June 18, 2009

How could it be hard to do a totally unrelated story without Neve? Seriously, if it's all characters then why the fuck care? Oh, cause SHE was going to be the killer? That's fucking retarded anyway and no fan would've loved that twist.


WalkingDeadGuy
10:53pm, June 18, 2009

Awe come on, this sucks ass. Oh well she was probably going to get killed off in the first fifteen anyways. But still. :-(


runbitch!
11:03pm, June 18, 2009

What a bitch, I mean Scream is the only reason anybody talks about her and remembers her lame ass. Do yourself a favor Neve and come back to horror.


ugapuppy
11:04pm, June 18, 2009

Move on without her! Her story was told and completed in three films. No need to include her.


Slasher Freak
11:10pm, June 18, 2009

Maybe this is a sign for this reboot not to happen.


cjhorrorfan13
11:12pm, June 18, 2009

OH NO!!


cjhorrorfan13
11:16pm, June 18, 2009

OH NO :( :( my heart just sank 68493432543254325432543254325432654 Feet


Krug09
11:24pm, June 18, 2009

WTF is that... lady doing now where she can't make a fucking cameo?!?! When was her last role? 2003?!?!?! Or is she just to fucking famous now to pay homage to the film series that made her fucking ass. Pretentious bitch...


Krug09
11:26pm, June 18, 2009

forgot to add maybe Scream 4 isn't artsy enough for her to play in... and it isn't some stupid romance movie no one gives a shit about...


takingbacksados
11:32pm, June 18, 2009

Aww bummer! *sarcasm*


truchainsaw28
11:38pm, June 18, 2009

good for her sounds like a bad idea anyways


Feleron
11:50pm, June 18, 2009

HEY NEVE WTF ARE U DOING RIGHT NOW...OH...NOTHING...HMMM TAKE THE PAYCHECK AND DO THE ONLY THING YOUVE EVER DONE WORTH TALKING ABOUT (besides the lezzy scene with denise richards in WildThing :) )


GTRAD
11:53pm, June 18, 2009

SCREAM WAS STUPID. HOW BOUT SOMTHING ORIGINAL?


milkieboy
11:54pm, June 18, 2009

Let's move on...


flesheater123
11:55pm, June 18, 2009

LOL well the time this flick would of been made she would of been like 40 something LOL....


Comments Page 1 of 4 | Next -> | Last ->>
You have to be logged in to comment!
If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.


USERNAME:
PASSWORD:

Related Headlines

Kevin Williamson Spills More on 'Scream IV'
January 29, 2010
Confirms Wes Craven's involvement....

Arquette and Cox Have Different Perspectives on Craven's Involvement in 'Scream IV'
January 18, 2010
Someone is being honest...

Neve Campbell Says Craven is in Fact Returning for 'Scream IV'
November 25, 2009
Shooting to begin this April...

Courteney Cox Thinks Gale Weathers is Miserable in 'Scream IV'
November 16, 2009
Returning star makes 'Scream' predictions...

'Scream IV' Writer Talks Sidney Prescott's Fate, Death Scenes and Comedy
November 11, 2009
Really addresses some major questions bout new trilogy....


More Headlines










BD NEWS

Main
DVD
Indie
Video Games
Comic Books
MOVIES

Reviews
Coming Soon
Trailers
Movie Pit
FEATURES

Interviews
Articles
Podcasts
Dead Pixels
Graphic Content
COMMUNITY

My Profile
The Infected
Forums
Blogs
Galleries
ABOUT

BD Staff
Contact Us
News Feeds
Advertise

BLOODYDISGUSTING.COM/BLOODY-DISGUSTING.COM 2001-2010 BLOODY-DISGUSTING LLC - Privacy Policy - Terms Of Service