Fridaythe13th, rarely do remakes RECREATE a franchise. Especially now, considering how BAD modern remakes are. Out of the mess load of remakes we got in the last 8 years, which ones turned into full blown franchises? The most we got were one sequel, then no pulse. TCM got The Beginning. Halloween's going to get a sequel(though Zombie never wanted one). Amityville HOrror is getting a DIRECT TO DVD sequel(that's what remakes are worth, no?). The Ring got the horrid Ring II. The Grudge got The Grudge II(urgh). Other than that, dead water, baby. Most of these remakes aren't good enough to hold or resurrect a franchise. They actually become the final nail in the coffin. Though, I have to admit, it DOESN'T have anything to do with remakes, in general. It has EVERYTHING to do how the remake is approached. I mentioned this elsewhere, remakes aren't taken seriously, hence they aren't strong pieces of work. Strong pieces of work aren't stable enough to act as the base for a new franchise to take rise. Just no way. Had the industry actually set out to make GOOD horror movies instead of either PG-13 fluff or extreme tit and gorefests, maybe remakes would be strong enough. I can tell you right now, if you decide to remake NOES and say, "I all have to do is keep it as gory as possible and have lots of teens having sex", you missed the target of what NOES is. That's something I believe drives most of the modern horror directors. Many, if not MOST of them were probably kids up to their early teens during the 80s. They watched horror for the sole purpose of getting off on naked chicks and gore, hence what they remember is nothing more than THAT. Acutal important issues like character interraction, atmosphere and such aren't AS important as tit and gore. Not saying there AREN'T horror movies just about tit and gore, but it seems to be a big belief that THAT'S all what makes horror, when it clearly isn't. Horror shouldn't be made with a 13-year old boy's mentality.