Let's not miss the important part of this story - how it might affect screenwriters and filmmakers if the lawsuit is successful. It's easy to come to B-D and trash Hollywood for being unoriginal; far easier than creating a wholly original story/movie after a century of films and thousands of years of narrative tradition. DISTURBIA is an awful lot like REAR WINDOW. It's also different enough that if the lawsuit succeeds, it could open the door for a flood of similar claims, which could result in a lot of movies not getting made in the future. As a writer, I'm all for copyright laws and the protection they provide, but where is the line between plagiarism and coincidental or respectful similarity? Could Bob Clark's estate sue John Carpenter for plagiarizing BLACK CHRISTMAS with HALLOWEEN? Could Carpenter in turn sue Sean Cunningham for a piece of the FRIDAY THE 13TH franchise, who might then want to sue the makers of MY BLOODY VALENTINE and countless others for copying his product? This lawsuit may be a legitimate claim, but it could also set a dangerous precedent, prompting studios to opt out of just about any project which might open them up to similar litigation due to superficial similarities to an existing work.