i would definalty pay to see this one.

Writers ALWAYS, ALWAYS over exaggerate on how gory their work is. They always think they're superior to others with gore standard, when in reality they're fairly tame. (Remember M. Night's comments about The Happening being rated X? Ha! That movie was PG-13 all the way!) I've yet to see a Greg McLean movie that was even close to the level of violence in your standard horror movie, much less above and beyond it. Wolf Creek was fairly brutal, but it did nothing on the gore/violence/graphicness scale at all. Rouge was pretty much PG if they had taken out a few f-words. So, really, I don't think Wolf Creek 2 will be much gorier than your standard movie. If Greg McLean does make the bloodbath he's alluding to, I'll be as happy as hell. But I know he won't.

I'd be game for another. Loved the first one.

i'm one of the few who HATED Wolf Creek. i DO think McLean is a good director though. i really like ROGUE. i'll pass on WC 2.

the first like the strangers bored me to hell.

Yeeeeeessssssssssss!

Hell yeah! I loved Wolf Creek!

I think a sequel would be awesome. The Mick character was as evil of a killer as we have seen on screen in some time. I like the director's idea of making the horror over the top. Make this happen.

I would be very upset if I never saw the killer from this movie again. I'm fully behind a sequel as long as the director has new & exciting ideas.

1) Wolf Creek was tons better than Hostel. 2) Please, no sequel. We already know what the fuck is going on. 3) Do something original, AGAIN. Seriously, he builds the story and characters so well....just come up with a new situation.

NixEclips: (1) Hostel lacked the artisticness of Wolf Creek, but Wolf Creek lacked the creativity and morality of Hostel. I'd take Hostel over it any day. (2 and 3), I wholeheartedly agree 100%. This is one movie that would be better off without a sequel, by a long shot.

i loved work creek the suspense was killing me and the fear felt so real!

lol I always misspell for typing so fast I ment wolf

Hostel won me over with the characters, surprisingly, but it didn't have the tension and emotion that make me care. I have much man-love for Eli Roth. But..seriously, Hostel better than Wolf Creek? No way.

And thanks.

Well Wolf Creek 2 would be interesting if it were called something else, isolating the sequel as it's own movie, just bringing back the old killer. Wolf Creek was tons better than most horror films that come out so rapidly. And I think we would all appreciate this being revisited as long as Greg doesn't make a "Wolf Creek 2" sequels are overrated but allusion is creative.

It would be a great idea to make a sequel independently and just make it a gorefest and just let it go straight to DVD. It wouldn't be that much of a difference from 9 bucks at the theater to 25 bucks for the DVD or 5 bucks to rent, everyones gonna want to see it.

why not remake the original, except this time make it really good.

Wolf Creek rocked, big time!!! so much more he could do with a sequel. This could rock hard if he chooses to do it.

I'm another one of the few who hated Wolf Creek. But I think a sequel would be interesting. There's no denying that the director is great, but I just really didn't see what all the fuss was all about for the first film.

this movie was the biggest let down ever... they were saying how it was going to be the goriest flick ever. And it turned out to be a fuckin cliche piece of shit. Maybe just maybe if Wolf 2 does come it will carry the gore like the first one should of have. IDK maybe the unrated DVD has more gore.... but I dont' want fine out.

flesheater123, i agree. especially since the 1st half of the movie was basically a combination of "MTV REAL WORLD Australia" and an Australian travel video. boring.

He is nothing but a try hard. xxx, give me a break, i smell bull shit. Obviously he is looking for attention.

Wow. So much hate for a film that did what it said it would do. Wolf Creek was a "film". Not an *event*, like Hostel. It told a story. If you were bored or whatever, it's because you expected it to do more than it was supposed to.

gestured?

flesheater123: I saw the unrated edition and I can't remember a single scene of gore at all. Some brutality, yes. Gore, no. Can someone please explain to me what was gory about Wolf Creek? They didn't even have the balls to show the chick get her spine ripped out, even thought it's been shown in plenty of movies before it.

I would love to see a sequel.

Wolf Creek is one of the best horror films to come along in years, and if any movie madman deserves another outing it's Mick! Bring it on!!

Bring on WC2!!!!

Wolf Creek 2 great idea loved the first one. as for the girl getting her spine ripped out, she did'nt mick cut her spinal cord so she did'nt run.

groovy

This would be great loved the first one Fozzy is right he just stuck the knife between discs and twisted to severe the nerve. Also sometimes not showing the gore makes you see more in your head if it's executed right for example the original texas was supposed to be PG it was the terror aspect that got it an R. Jaws actually has ten times more blood violence and nudity then that and most R movies today and that got a PG.

You're spot on Irish Mic, TCM was banned here in the UK for years because of what people thought they saw! Less is more!