There are two main appeals to slasher movies: the interesting look/costume of the killer, and how inventive the killer gets when it comes to dispatching his prey. Everything else is pretty much superfluous in the long run; sure it’s nice to have good actors or impressive production value, but those things aren’t quite what the movie is remembered for (for proof – look no further than Happy Birthday To Me, which had A list talent in cast and crew, and yet the only thing anyone remembers is the guy getting shish-ka-bobbed). However, there is one thing that 99% of all slasher movies have to come up with that is truly unique: the killer’s motive...
For whatever reason, if a film copies another’s reason, it’s considered a letdown. Scream? Billy Loomis’ excuse was nearly identical to, again, Happy Birthday To Me’s killer. Any killer who escapes from a mental institution is immediately compared to Michael Myers, and you can’t step foot in the woods without a Jason Voorhees fan crying foul.
Well, with this need for “originality” being so important, and dozens of slasher movies being made every year, not every motive will be as memorable as “That girl... that Strode girl... was Michael Myers’ sister!” Most are just strong enough to sustain your suspension of disbelief until the end credits roll, but then there are a few (10, to be exact!) that are just SO idiotic that they deserve their own list.
So without any further ado, I present:
The 10 Stupidest Motives In Slasher Movie History!
NOTE – Obviously, the very nature of the article pretty much insures that the endings of these movies will be spoiled in whole or part. As the guy who forces himself to watch at least one horror movie every day of his life, I end up seeing a lot of obscure movies. Thus, some of these aren’t exactly in the same league as My Bloody Valentine or whatever, so as a warning: A. if you’ve never heard of the movie, it’s probably for a good reason, and B. again, the ending will be spoiled.
10. Bloody Birthday (1981)
This is a nasty killer kid movie from 1980 or so, and I highly recommend it. However, it would have worked better if they never bothered giving even the slightest explanation for the kids’ behavior, because the reason they come up with is possibly the most baffling in slasher history. It seems our three tykes have murderous tendencies simply because they were born during a lunar eclipse. What? How does that work? Aren’t there babies being born every 6 seconds or something? Wouldn’t there be a lot of killers as a result of this apparently all powerful solar system alignment?
9. Prank Goes Wrong (various)
We’ve all seen these movies – a prank (usually on a nerdy character) goes horribly wrong, and then 10, 15, or 20 years later (killers like multiples of 5), he/she (or their twin) comes back to seek revenge on them all. Some examples include: Slaughter High, Scarecrow, Terror Train, Prom Night... it was OK once or twice, but it’s enough. Plus, half the time the killer ends up dispatching a few folks that had nothing to do with the prank, so they sort of lose the sympathy vote.
8. Shrooms (2007)
This is a new one, so I won’t spoil who the killer is, only to say that their reasons are funnier than any of the intentional humor in the movie. Five youths who never really did anything wrong are dead by the end of the film, and it’s all because... they wanted to eat mushrooms instead of seeing the sights and appreciating the beauty of Ireland. Right. Of course, the fact that the killer eats mushrooms too sort of renders him/her a bit of a hypocrite, but since the movie isn’t all that bad I’ll forgive them.
7. I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)
Technically, this should be higher on the list, based on pure stupidity. But the actual motive (revenge) isn’t the problem; it’s HOW ol’ Ben Willis went about it that makes you want to grab screenwriter Trey Callaway by the shoulders and shake him until he apologizes. Rather than just kill the girl in her sleep, or have his son (Will Benson – “Ben’s son” being the stupidest plot development, of any kind, in any movie, ever) do it, Ben instead makes a pirate radio signal, makes sure Jennifer Love Hewitt’s character has her radio tuned into it (and on at all) at the right time to win a contest (with the wrong answer to boot), flies her and 3 friends to the Bermudas during a weekend when a storm will ensure few other people are around, and then manages to kill everyone BUT the two he actually had the beef with. Are you fucking kidding me?
6. Dark Fields (2006)
This pitiful little independent slasher movie has one of the best all time screen mistakes (the characters are allegedly in the middle of nowhere, seeking a gas station, but there’s a big old Shell station in the background), and it strangely sort of factors into the film’s big reveal. We learn at the end of the film that our resident killer is SPECIFICALLY going after people seeking gas, because gas thieves killed his parents many years ago. So if the guy just got rid of his home pump, or if a Mobil opened next door, the killer would more or less be forced to retire. Amazing.
5. Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
Fans are pretty divided over whether or not Laurie being Michael’s sister (revealed in II) was a good idea. But it’s certainly better than the “expanded” version of this motive – Michael wasn’t going after his family just for the hell of it, he was doing it because he was a pawn in a plan from a group of Druids who were trying to... you know, I still haven’t the slightest goddamn idea what they were up to. All I know is this: rewriting four (superior) movies’ worth of scenes is a really cheap move, made even more upsetting when the film became Donald Pleasence’s swan song. And if Michael needed to impregnate a family member, why did he try so hard to kill Laurie and Jamie in the previous films?
4. Death Row (2007)
Honestly, I didn’t think anything could be funnier than the DVD box’s claims that this movie had a “stellar cast that includes Todd Bridges and Joe Estevez” (neither of whom are the actual stars of the film). But I was dead wrong, because when it came time for the killer to reveal his “tragic” backstory, I almost lost it. The killer is a prison guard (this isn’t a spoiler, it’s revealed right at the beginning) who was forced to perform oral pleasure on an inmate, and no one came to his rescue. Now he is seeking revenge on inmates AND his fellow officers (not the ones involved, mind you). So he’s strong enough to wipe out hardass criminals and trained officers, but he wasn’t strong enough to use teeth?
3. Shredder (2003)
This is a direct to video movie about a killer at a ski resort. It’s terrible. But even worse is the motive: the killer HATES SNOWBOARDERS. I’m not joking. He wants people to ski again, so he kills snowboarders, for their sin of... what? Progress? I imagine the sequel, should we be unlucky enough to have one, would find a killer going after Rollerbladers in a local Roll-R-Way, in an attempt to revive the dormant 2x2 skating wheel formation. Maybe they could set a big kill scene to “I Got A Brand New Pair Of Rollerskates”! Hell, I smell franchise! Shredder 3: Game Over: “Damn kids and their Xbox 360s! In my day we had Sega Genesis!” *sharpens axe*
2. Freddy vs. Jason (2003)
This movie was in development for a full decade (more if you count the attempt in 1988), and there were more scripts leaked to the Internet than any movie in history. And THIS was the best they could come up with?? Freddy using Jason to kill kids so that they would be afraid of him again? First of all, if Freddy’s strong enough to bring Jason back from Hell and have him do his bidding, why isn’t he strong enough to appear in a few dreams? And second: why does this movie have a goddamn plot at all? No one cared about WHY, they just wanted them to fight. The idiotic story (made even dumber by Freddy’s constant explaining of it to the audience, as if it was really that difficult to follow) just got in the way of Freddy fighting Jason.
1. Urban Legends: Final Cut (2000)
When I saw this movie during opening weekend, I was the only one in the theater. So while it was kind of sad that I didn’t have anyone to share the moment with, it’s also kind of good that no one heard my maniacal laughter when the killer explained why he had just wiped out half of the film class. It seems the guy was a failed filmmaker himself, and his student film had been passed over in favor of another, better film. So now, 20 years later, he’s still bitter enough to kill the entire cast and crew of a really good student film so he could pass it off as his own. The idea that this nonsensical plan would work is stupid enough (the crew he could maybe explain away, but wouldn’t anyone get suspicious that all of the cast members were now dead???) but the fact that we have to believe that there is such a thing as a “really good student film” is just outlandish*. When I come up with slasher movies in my head, and plan out a motive, no matter how dumb the (usually drunken) idea I have is, I can always remember that Urban Legend 2’s is still dumber.
BONUS. Final Exam (1981)
This movie clearly aped Halloween (structure, score, and female archetypes are identical), but they went one step further. While the sequels (over)explained Michael Myers’ motives away, in the original he was just Michael Myers, escaped mental patient in a Shatner mask, going after babysitters. Well, Final Exam’s killer doesn’t even have that much. He has no mask, no name, nothing. He’s just a guy. They don’t even offer a radio broadcast about an escaped mental patient; for all we know, this dude simply got bored during his day shift at the box factory. Sometimes, yes: less is more. But sometimes it’s just lazy. At least the other 10 movies TRIED.
*I myself have worked on awful student films (I edited, and appeared in, one in which a group of folks eat ice cream and then throw up. That’s it), and attended a few school festivals with “films” featuring nothing but 10 minutes of a guy playing with a yo-yo (that one won an award, if memory serves), so I have earned the right to make this crack. And for the record, no, I don’t really believe that all student films are bad.
Hilarious list, especially the Death Row segment! But I have to disagree with Freddy vs Jason. I thought the plot and premise worked as well as any other could have. Remember that Freddy is powered by both fear and his victim's souls, so until he got the ball rolling (Jason killing in his name) then he WAS powerless. When they were both in hell, all he did was appear to Jason as his mother to set things into motion. Jason revived by his own power to do his mother's bidding. Remember the line that Jason cannot really die, he just sleeps? Makes sense that hell cannot contain him as Jason is flesh, while Freddy on the other hand is spirit. I thought it was ingenious! Oh, and Freddy's "constant" explaining to the audience happend only, what...twice? And BEFORE all the action started? Come on man, don't be hating on Freddy vs Jason! It was a fanboy's dream come true!
Ironic how you said you didn't want to reveal much about the Scrooms cause its a new film and the you told us just about everything. Thanks...
list was kinda fun
That's what i don't get about u fools, curse of michael myers was good in the way they did it... i mean.. sure they could of changed it... but i really love the idea of a child being cursed and not being able to die until the whole of his family is dead, that's the only reason i liked halloween, but the way they made it out was crap, like a man in a black suite which guids michael or some shit and stuff...
I would have to disagree with Freddy vs Jason also since it did produce Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash comic book miniseries that constantly sells out and has been reprinted. And just like the Hulk film done by Ang Lee, it had a director, Ronnie Yu, that directed martial arts films with some hints of Asian horror that did not involve horror icons like Freddy and Jason.
Gotta diagree with Final Exam. Who cares if it was a Halloween knock off? Just about every 80s slasher knocked off Halloween or Friday the 13th. Even to this day they are still knocked off. Having no motive at all does feel like a slight cop out as if the the makers couldn't think of anything, but it also adds some mystery. It wasn't handled well for the most part, but an interesting idea and no way should make this list. Disagree on Freddy Vs Jason. Not the greatest idea, but not bad. Try reading some of the rejected ideas. The one used is a masterpiece compared to some. Totally 100% on Urban Legend: Final Cut. Beyond idiotic
thats why Final Exam was a bonus. It had nothing at all, not even a name, let alone a motive. It being a "Halloween knockoff" wasn't the issue, it was that they went in the total other direction of stupid motives.
These lists... I suppose they should be taken for what they are, one person's opinion, but man do I need to stop reading them. Freddy vs Jason had a perfectly cohesive plot, better than the vast majority of films in its genre... and Freddy did appear in several dreams. Curse of Michael Myers... the theatrical version got a bit confused, admittedly, but actually tying his character to Halloween in some way was the most possible interesting origin they could have come up with. Check out the Producer's Cut... there it all makes sense.
Cool list. Glad you included Halloween 6. What a dreadful addition to the franchise (and yes I have seen both cuts.) Made me glad H20 ignored everything after Part II. I just wish they stopped at H20.
Oh BC, the fact that you dont "get" movies like Shredder only solidifies my opinion of you. lol. yet, I have a really hard time not liking someone who loves horror so much. *sigh*
Not a bad list, per se, although billing it as the 10 Stupidest ever and then not listing 10 specific titles is a bit misleading. Every armchair horror expert thinks he or she could have done better with FVJ, but frankly the finished product was far superior to any of the rejected ideas and any of the fan fic concepts that fill message boards across cyberspace. Inclduing FVJ smacks of the same "One more shot!" motivation as the inclusion of Rob Zombie's HALLOWEEN on ever Worst list posted here on B-D. As for FINAL EXAM, it certainly is stupid, but it's also consistent. The pretentious novelization also fails to offer any explanation for the killings!
"And second: why does this movie have a goddamn plot at all? No one cared about WHY, they just wanted them to fight." And here, demonstrated clearly for all to see, is why fans shouldn't ever make movies! New Line cared about "why". They cared enough to take their time and create an $80 million mega-hit. Had the illogical approach to filmmaking recommended in this article been taken, FVJ would likely have grossed abou $5 mil and been the final nail in the coffin for both franchises.
I agree with the majority of this list, but I have to disagree on Freddy vs. Jason. I recall you giving this movie 4 out of 5 skulls, where you mention "the ten years of effort it took them to get things right", saying that it has a "well-stitched plot", and "this script seemed flawless to me on first viewing. The old scripts had some of the most moronic ways of returining these characters to the screen." Why the change of heart, Mr. D?
I found Freddy vs. Jason's plot to be a sufficient starting point to get these two icons to fight. Despite Freddy's lack of power to enter dreams, it makes sense to me that Freddy is able to manipulate Jason, since both Freddy and Jason are in hell at the beginning of the film and thus on the same playing field. Plus this movie did need some sort of plot, otherwise it would have been awkward and lazy to just have the two fighting for no reason whatsoever. At least it wasn't one of those heinous scripts that were initially proposed...
Those are some plum choices there. Well, except for FVJ. Replace that with VALENTINE-2001. That motive COULD hvae been good, if not for the harsh way it was put onto screen!
Wow, thanks, I'm a horror/slsher nerd, so regardless of how stupid they may be, you just gave me a list of films to go watch for the rest of the year. Keep it up.
Are you sure this are movies, or Scooby-Doo episodes specially the snowboard killers one, Man not even on weed somebody would come with those ideas or maybe....... Puff Puff
Halloween 6, and Freddy vs. Jason, I would have to disagree.
I also think you should watch Halloween 6 again, doesn't sound like you understood it too well, Mr. Disgusting.(if that's even your real name)
Mr D didnt write the article... I swear some of you guys don't actually read the introductions to these article and just skip right ahead to the flaming.
And there's a novelization for Final Exam?!?!?!?!?!?
Thanks, now i have to see Shredder. hahaha.
Disagree with Freddy vs. Jason though.
I agree with whoever said "replace that with scream 3". or scream 2 i guess.
I feel very fortunate that I haven't seen any of these. They all sound like shit. But you should really throw in the upcoming Prom Night remake too. I know it's not out yet - but like a hooker on a politicians' boat cruise; it's sure to SUCK!
I dont agree with Freddy vs Jason. That was a good movie (and great soundtrack too). Scream 3 was just a lazy end to the scream franchise. Didnt like it at all. I know what you did(dont care who got bludgeoned to death) films all need to be in the list too
Hey Fuckass! Yeah you, Mr.Disgusting. Fuck you! Why the fuck would you list a spoiler for Shrooms you fuckin' idiot? You run a highly established website yet, what, you failed to realize this movie has not yet been released everywhere? Not even in North America? Here's another Fuck You to Mrs. Disgusting.
I have to say the list was pretty good, The Curse of Micheal Myers was spot on. Though I also have to say some people really need to see who wrote the article before they start slamming someone who didn't write it.
I agree with some of the list (ISKWYDLS, Death Row, etc.) but totally disagree with F vs J. Freddy's reasonings were perfect. Like you said, everyone is there to see them fight, so they kept it basic when it came to story. What we got was a lot better than any of those other shitty ass scripts that leaked.
Oh, and Shredder is actually a pretty good slasher flick. I don't remember the killer's motive being what you wrote, but it's still a good slasher nonetheless.
Hey Guardian - sorry, but uh... it says right at the top, before anything about Shrooms (or any of the other movies) that the descriptions will spoil the movies. It's not my fault you don't pay attention. And Shrooms has been screening in North American festivals like Screamfest for quite a while...
Scream 2 and Scream 3 - are just takes on the most famous slasher motives -- Mother killing for dead son (taken from Friday the 13th) and the brother motive (taken from Halloween)... you can't blame a homage to horror films for borrowing the most famous motives from the big franchises... Scream 1 arguably takes from Friday the 13th as well.
UL1 wasn't too bad... it was revenge for getting her boyfriend killed. Nothing spectacular one way or the other. It was another of the "Idiotic way to GET revenge" ones, of which I'd rather use I Still Know which was far stupider. And yeah, the Scream ones were fine. I mean, NO slasher motive has ever been like WOW THAT IS AMAZING! Some are better than others, but it usually boils down to either revenge or a lover scorned. Its when they get specific (Revenge... on GAS THIEVES!) that it gets really laughable. Again, just my 2 cents...
Oh and I'll make a deal with all of the Halloween 6 defenders... I'll take it off the list if you can explain why Michael needed to fuck his niece. The one he had spent the previous 2 films trying to kill.
Hey fuckass, I never said it never got released in North America, I said it wasn't released everywhere in North America. It made it to basically one theatre downtown in Toronto. Yeah, sure it said that on top, but it also said later that he wouldn't spoil it. You have to be a fuckin' vegetable to agree that it's ok to ruin the end of a newly released and not even widely released film. I won't get to see it until the DVD comes out. Dick.
Yeah, im sure a horror movie called "Shrooms" is gonna be so AWESOME that you're all torn up inside about it being spoiled for you.
And maybe if you would have actually paid attention, you would have noticed that Mr. D didn't even write this list.
Hahaha, so he's angry about my ignorance of what movies play in his town, and also the fact that he knew the movies were going to be spoiled and read it anyway. Even funnier - it's not even spoiled! The killer's identity is not given away, so I don't know what he's so angry about. The motive is revealed AFTER the killer is, so by the time you get to anything I've "spoiled" you would already have learned who the killer was without my help. Are you saying that the killer's motive is more important a surprise than their identity? Or are you just bitching for the sake of being a little bitch? Just curious.
I still want to see where in the movie Halloween 6, that they said Micheal needed to fuck his sister..or neice, never saw that part...why don't you point that out for us there chief.
Well they talked about it in Fangoria articles leading up to the film, how Michael was the father. And its in the producers cut... Michael is shown in a flashback, walking into a room where Jamie is tied up. She says "Please uncle don't hurt me!" or something to that effect, and then they flashforward to when she is having the baby. You know how babies are made, right "chief"?
Well since Mr.BD usually makes these lists, apologies to him this time. But to BC, Fuck You. If I have any last words on this site (which by the way is on one lame downward spiral), I'm gonna make 'em "Fuck You". My life doesn't depend on this site so warn me, ban me, kiss my ass.
okay i have to agree with all of these but i think with Halloween curse of Michael Myers they left it open ended intentionaly so they would have a reason for making more sequels kind of a cliff hangar and thus is the reason i made my new script " Nightmare on Halloween" that and i wanted to show A. that Freddy can be scary ( Since Freddy vs Jason and Nightmare 5& 6 ruined it and B.giving Michael a satisfying end to make up for Rob zombies remake and make it surprising if a new sequel is made after C. to give Michael his humanity back as well as take the ideas and fix the holes so that none of the films ( except 3 it cant be saved) will have been made in vain
"Nightmare on Halloween"? GIVE michael his humanity back?? are you ppl fuc*ing kidding?? Freddy was,and never will be scary,just a lame greasy scab poppin off gay one liners "Halloween 6" was an insult as far as sequels go..this list hits it right off the bat
I have a question...what did Halloween 3 have to do with the Halloween franchise? No Michael Myers. Just a weird toy making company whom wanted kids and adults alike to play with them and then they can kill them. They had the guys in their suits, whom were robots right? emotionless killers. wtf was that all about. The ending left it open to think that all these people died, cos they didnt know whats going on. Cue Halloween 4 with michael myers again. but yeah, as I said, I agree with the list, with the exception of FvJ. I liked that movie.
Amazing, sat down last night to watch something on tv and guess what was on but Urban Legen 2 which I promptly turned off for one of the reasons you mentioned, being it is a stupid motive. But I still think that is probably the best part of the movie, it just goes down hill from there.
I highly doubt that any of these flicks were any worse that Texas Chainsaw 4. I mean, could you believe the dumbest ending ever conceivable?
That ending made Friday the 13th part 7's ending seem cool!
What was wrong with making Ben Willis have a son? I thought it was cool that he killed his own son cause he was so stupid at the end there. Also, I think you're reading too much into how he got them there. No offense.
SHREDDER : Everything said in the article is wrong . Wrong Gender motive etc the kills are mostly fresh i recommend this movie your choice . FVJ : Actually more comedy than horror fun movie ( most friday the 13th movies have some very funny parts dumb dialog face it no sacred cows to protect here ) most good horror movies in my view do have a bit of humor .
yeah, to Guardian, he never said he wouldn't spoil the movie, just said he wouldn't spoil the identity of the killer, you really do need to relearn your reading and comprehension there buddy, and also, speaking of movies that should be added to the list, Cherry Falls, some killer with a Norman Bates complex killing virgins because mommy was raped years ago and she beats him
I'd just as soon put HALLOWEEN III: SEASON OF THE WITCH on there just because that film sucked so bad [worse is that it's available with HALLOWEEN II on dvd when it should just be HALLOWEEN I and II only]!!!
~(^)~
Bloody Birthday is great - those kids, especially the cute blonde girl, really knew how to take care of people they didn't like!
A lot of people don't like Halloween:The Curse Of Michael Myers, but I enjoyed it - ending sucked, though.
And I love Final Exam! I even have the paperback movie tie-in and the vinyl soundtrack! Sure the movie is bloodless and cliched but for some reason it's always been entertaining to me.
You have to be logged in to comment! If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.
You are browsing as a guest!
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
SEND TO A FRIEND
