No, this image is a bit off... especially in the head. Anyway, I'm really responding to the always reliable chrisby, who, as usual, has jumped to wild and inane conclusions that seem to be pulled from thin air. OF COURSE YOU GET TO SEE THE MONSTER IN THE FILM! Where in the blue hell did you get the idea that you don't?!?!?!? You don't listen to what people tell you, you never read what is written, and your comments on most topics seem to indicate that you rarely actually see any of the movies covered on B-D... all of which would be fine, if you didn't always feel the need to work yourself into a rage over things you've made up in your own head and come here to piss on people's parades. Which brings me to rainbowblack's odd anti-capitalism, anti-sequel rant. CLOVERFIELD barely scratches the surface of this story, and the ending certainly doesn't conclude the beast's rampage. How would continuing the story ruin it? We're not talking about making up stuff to cash in; we're talking about telling the rest of the tale. Oh well. I guess you have to have somewhere to complain about America, so why not pick a monster movie comment section?