so u don't actually get to see the monster in the movie? nothing... not one thing of it... NOW WHY THE FUCK WOULD I GO SEE IT? fuck that shit... im not wasting my time nor my money on something that isn't even seen in the film!

chrisby, I hope you go see this because it was a amazing movie and nothing in this article suggests that you never see the thing. Trust me it looks great, and a hell of alot better then the viewers drawing in this article!

You do see the monster chrisby? I think they do an excellent job at showing you the monster when it's all from a single camera. You get full shots, a good close up, really everything without having too much. SO GLAD this movie is doing as well as it is. It was so original and different . LOLL I didn't notice the the drop in the water at the end when I went to the midnight showing Thursday night but Friday when I woke up apparently everyone else did and was talking about it. I was like what, water, when? I gotta go see it again SOON now.

I have a picture of the splash.

really chrisby, you do see the monster(s) a shitload lol more than i thought i was gonna lol and i was like the only one in the theatre i went to that saw the monster fall into the water

Like OMG!!!

It's the fucking satellite that fell from the sky - Yeah, the monster came from outer space...jesus christ

Why do you guys continue to use the bogus drawing of the creature? It looks NOTHING like that...

that movie was really great. i think they should make a sequal.at least show wat happened or somtin.liz survived...

yes I saw that scene and saw that object that fell from the sky into the water. That explains where it came from.

The satellite didn't wake up the monster. The company apparently went down into the ocean trenches to search for their satellite, which awoke it. If the falling satellite woke the monster, why did it take a few weeks to come out and attack on land?

This picture is about 30% correct... The monster in the movie is fucking wicked looking, almost like something out of "Gears of War"

the monster in the movie was like a gorilla face with long arms sharp teeth this pic is mostly correct cloverfield doest give us a good shot at the back. CANT WAIT TIL VIRAL MARKETING FOR CLOVERFIELD 2 AT THE END OF THE MOVIE IT SAYS HELP US BUT PLAYED BACKWARDS IT SAYS HELP US

CORRECTION PLAYED BACKWARDS IT SAYS ITS STILL ALIVE SO IN 2 THEYLL MAKE IT ATTACKING THE WORLD OR SOME SHIT

this is no cloverfield 2! even if they make iti will refuse to acknowlage it existance, by doing so they ruin the first one.damn america and the constant whoring of theything sacred good thing the writers are still on strike lol

I usually agree some sequels ruin movies, but what I've read about this one could be that this wasn't the only video being shot that night. So the sequel would be the same night. Which could still be bad, but could be cool.

sequels doint ruin the first that it just stupid,and even thought i am writing, you guys have too much time on your hands. Plus it looks nothing like that pic. THat looks like the host too much. The moster is in no way reptilian and is skinny. Its head is under its front arms walks kind of like a spider. It has a tail but doesnt seem to use its back legs too much. also, it would be cool i guess, with a dif cam and diff people. But it would have similar results and it would still be alive so i doint know about that. anyway iam not reeves so its not up too me but unless it kicks ass, the thought is a downer.

yes this image is not Exactly accurate i seen the movie on opening day you see the monster close to the end but after about the first 30 mins you only see parts like an arm the tail that knocks the bridge down the foot that stomps the tank and shit like that but i still enjoyed it only wish it wasn't filmed entirely first person shot like the movie was .

No, this image is a bit off... especially in the head. Anyway, I'm really responding to the always reliable chrisby, who, as usual, has jumped to wild and inane conclusions that seem to be pulled from thin air. OF COURSE YOU GET TO SEE THE MONSTER IN THE FILM! Where in the blue hell did you get the idea that you don't?!?!?!? You don't listen to what people tell you, you never read what is written, and your comments on most topics seem to indicate that you rarely actually see any of the movies covered on B-D... all of which would be fine, if you didn't always feel the need to work yourself into a rage over things you've made up in your own head and come here to piss on people's parades. Which brings me to rainbowblack's odd anti-capitalism, anti-sequel rant. CLOVERFIELD barely scratches the surface of this story, and the ending certainly doesn't conclude the beast's rampage. How would continuing the story ruin it? We're not talking about making up stuff to cash in; we're talking about telling the rest of the tale. Oh well. I guess you have to have somewhere to complain about America, so why not pick a monster movie comment section?

A) You see the monster quite clearly...B) The above image has some of the qualities but the armorred spine and head are definately different. A better description for the head would be the space slug from Empire Strikes Back on serious amounts of acid. C) The movie is worth a look, if only for the ass whoopin laid on Manhatten

I think this movie was great... awesome filming which gave you the impression that this really happened. Doubts that a sequel will come to explain the full story, if anything it'll be on the extra features when the dvd is released. Maybe it'll be a news cast of months after the attack with further details like how Dawn of the Dead did while the infestations occur.

I agree that this was a great film. When the end of the flick came i felt a little violated because I wanted more. But all in all i think this one is a stroke of genius. this reminds me of Alien..You didnt see much of the creature in the first one but it made people come back for more in Aliens. Unanswered questions are guaranteed return. I think the sequel for Cloverfield will be excellent if they stay on track. It is worth seeing. Chrisby is not a true Horror fan. JKROUSKOP...I like your style.

I believe that a sequel could be filmed in a traditional fashion, not so much on a first person thing, since at the start of the film NO SPOILERS HERE (it's in the trailer) you get the idea that someone recovered the camera, so we might get the answers of the creature origins, and some more things...

SATELLITE FELL THE SKY - A COMBINATION OF SLUSHO DRILLING & JAPANESE SEARCHING OCEAN FOR SATELLITE CAUSED MONSTER TO AWAKEN. THAT DRAWING DOESN'T EVEN LOOK LIKE THE MONSTER... AND ONLY A MORON WOULD THINK THE MONSTER DROPPED OUT OF THE FUCKING SKY

Like I said before. Just overblown hype.