Connect with us

Editorials

00’s Retrospect: A Wave Goodbye, A Look at 2009

Published

on

Y2K, 9/11, war and a a horrid recession, a major escape we had this decade was in the form of film, notorious for thriving during National crisis. Leading up to New Year’s Eve where we’ll ring in 2010, Bloody Disgusting will be looking back at the entire decade year by year through the eyes of various staff writers.. Inside you’ll find David Harley’s personal look back at the year 2009, the last of tis epic retrospect. Please share your memories for each year below, there are so many stories to be told!

’00 | ’01 | ’02 | ’03 | ’04 | ’05 | ’06 | ’07 | ’08 | ’09

More Retrospects:
-Top 20 Films of the Decade: 21-16 | 15-11 | 10-6 | 5-1
-Dead on Arrival: Ten Horror Duds of the Last Decade

2009

Much like 2008, 2009 started on a sour note for me with Amusement, a rather awful anthology film that is just as lazy as it is incomprehensible in parts. Shelved for what seemed like forever by Picturehouse, it finally went DTV in January. Also in January, Platinum Dunes’ first original horror film, The Unborn, hit the big screen to mixed results. While not a huge smash, it did provide us with a few good laughs and closer look at Odette Yustman, the latter of which made the theatre erupt in discussion. Ok, maybe that was just Tex and I, but that’s beside the point. So while most were disappointed with those films, My Bloody Valentine 3-D invigorated the 3-D horror market and while not being a great film, it was A LOT of fun. The downside: its success prompted dozens of new horror projects to all of a sudden be in 3-D. The After Dark Horrofest made a triumphant return in the beginning of the year, most of which lived up to the stigmata associated with the fest. The stand-out: Autopsy, a fun slasher film with a really strange, Cronenberg-esque ending.

Speaking of Platinum Dunes, early in January, we posted a casting call for their remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street, with Jackie Earle Hayley as Freddy Kruger. Not even a month later, casting rumors began gestating online with Hayley in the lead role. Two months later and we had our new Kruger cast. Coincidence? Yes. But very cool none the less. Then, in February, Jason hit the big screen and did incredible opening weekend business, proving that some franchises have staying power. Although it had a big drop-off in attendance after its opening, it did enough business to prompt talks of a sequel almost immediately and a date has even been set for it. Whether or not they actual make a Friday the 13th in winter is still up in the air.

In March, we got our first good remake in quite some time with The Last House On The Left. While it could have easily treaded torture-porn territory with its premise, which Craven revisited in the 70s (Ingmar Bergman’s The Virgin Spring is still my favorite take on the story), director Dennis Illiadis made a taut and tense filled horror flick. Also in March, we got A Haunting in Connecticut and Knowing, both of which had an interesting premise but failed to deliver. And, if anything, Knowing could’ve been a much better film had Nicolas Cage not been in it and director Alex Proyas not had regurgitated his previous films so much. I took my second annual trek out to Austin, TX for SXSW, where I caught an early screening of Drag Me To Hell and the Australian thriller The Horseman, both of which made my Top 10 list for 2009.

April was a month of big DVD premieres, as Rob Hall’s much anticipated Laid To Rest and Martyrs were released in the last half of the month. Both films feature gore o’ plenty and seem to have divided audiences down the middle. In fact, until Drag Me To Hell was released in late May, all was practically quiet on the horror front. With Drag, critics and fans seem to go apeshit over it, as I predicted they would when I saw it at SXSW, but its summer release seemed to only further confirm everyone’s suspicion that horror just doesn’t bode well in blockbuster season, especially when opening against a Pixar film. The rest of the summer was comprised of forgettable DTV releases – save for [REC], which was finally released stateside – until Orphan was released in July to moderate box office success. The most welcome surprises of the summer were Duncan Jones’ Moon, which isn’t a horror film but was covered on the site because we loved it and it’s destined for Oscar gold, and District 9, which told a really compelling story with a gory sci-fi setting. Here’s hoping Neill Blomkamp and his team eventually get to visit the Halo universe – I can dream, can’t I? Oh, how I can forget Platinum Dunes’ second original horror film The Horsemen, which was snuck out quietly into a handful of theatres in the beginning of the year and was released on DVD during the summer. Although not a God awful film, it certainly doesn’t fit into their filmography and did very little to rise above mediocrity.

Once late August rolled around, we had the double-feature weekend of The Final Destination and Halloween II. The former featured 3-D effects and a formula that started to get stale the last time around, while the latter was so batshit insane and boring at the same time that nobody really knew what to make of it. It ended up being rereleased for Halloween but seemed to disappear for the second time almost as quickly as it did the first time around.

Jennifer’s Body, written by Oscar winner Diablo Cody, debuted in mid-September and started the Juno backlash all over again. While some seemed to enjoy its sense of humor and attractive starlets, in the end it just seemed to further divide everyone on whether or not Cody is a good writer or not. And, on the TV front, Dexter and True Blood continue to rake in big ratings and captivate their audiences.

In late September, Tex and I made our way to Halloween Horror Nights in Orlando and were treated to some great movie themed houses (even one for The Wolfman, which hasn’t even come out yet). I give Universal big props for their unofficial C.H.U.D. house, even though it wasn’t great; I just like the idea of them using non-mainstream films as inspiration. If only Universal would make the houses a tad brighter, the experience would’ve been a lot better but, in the end, it stayed on par with the previous year in terms of scares and ingenuity. We also got to go back later in the month for “Boo Camp”, which meant me and Tex were given the chance to dress up as characters from Planet Terror and roam the streets scaring the bejeezus out of people.

Richard Kelly released his third feature, The Box, which left many people scratching their heads. Based on a Richard Matheson short story, the film delves into familiar Kelly territory in regards to both themes and off-the-wall science fiction. The Fourth Kind is released the same day and tries to trick audiences with “real documentary footage”, which is actually fake. Audiences see through it almost instantly and it disappears soon after. New Moon debuts at the end of November to record breaking numbers and usurps The Dark Knight as having the biggest opening day ever.

Much like 2008, the big winners of the year were those films who were hidden by studios and indie films. Carriers was snuck out in early September and while it didn’t do big business, its greatest fault was that its concept wasn’t very marketable, not that it was a terrible movie. Paranormal Activity, which was sitting on a shelf because it was supposed to be remade, was released with a “Demand It” campaign, which had fans demanding to see the film in their area. Eventually, it went wide and kept Saw VI out of the number one spot on its opening weekend, marking a first for the series. Trick `r Treat finally hit DVD after a lengthy road show that started in the summer. The result: many stores couldn’t keep it in stock, and those who could get a copy on release day couldn’t stop gushing about it. And finally, The Road, a slow-burn Cormac McCarthy adaptation (No Country For Old Men) about a father and son living in a post-apocalyptic world, hit theatres in late November to much acclaim. On the indie front, House of the Devil and Antichrist have extremely limited theatrical releases, backed by a VOD campaign, and get people talking – more so with the latter, which had a very strange reception at Cannes earlier in the year and inspired a lot of really bizarre takes on the film and its meaning.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading