Connect with us

Editorials

25 of the Decade’s Most Influential Figures in Horror

Published

on

While there were far too many influential figures in the horror genre this decade to include them all here, below are the 25 that were (arguably, of course) its greatest movers and shakers. From the video game revolution to sequel-happy movie studios; from the dark world of metal to the pages and panels of horror literature, love `em or hate `em the below 25 simply made too much noise to ignore. If you think we missed anything, throw it in the comment section below and say your piece. It’s all welcome!

25 OF THE DECADE’S MOST INFLUENTIAL
FIGURES IN HORROR!

Editor’s Note: This list is in no particular order and was compiled by Chris Eggertsen, Bloody Disgusting staff writer. This was NOT voted on or chosen by the entire staff.

Alexandre Aja


Defining work: High Tension (2003)

Why he’s on the list: Aja ushered in the era of extreme French horror with his gory High Tension and attained mainstream credibility after directing the successful remake of `70s exploitation classic The Hills Have Eyes. In the process, he opened the Hollywood door for contemporaries like Xavier Gens (Frontiere(s)), Pascal Laugier (Martyrs) and Alexandre Bustillo & Julien Maury (Inside). Whether or not his career continues to flourish Stateside, he’s the man responsible for opening the blood-spattered floodgates.

Alan Ball


Defining work: True Blood (2008-2009)

Why he’s on the list: Ball had dabbled (more like rubbed our faces) in death before, particularly with his hit HBO series Six Feet Under, but True Blood marked the first time he crossed over fully into the realm of the supernatural. By doing so he managed to tap into the Twilight zeitgeist and spawn a genuine pop cultural phenomenon. Of course, his show’s so good it probably didn’t need Stephanie Meyer to succeed.

Danny Boyle


Defining work: 28 Days Later (2003)

Why he’s on the list: Boyle’s zombie art film 28 Days Later unleashed the modern wave of walking dead movies on American multiplexes, but none of his adherents were able to match his uncompromising vision. As an Oscar-nominated director, his foray into horror gave a rare boost of critical respect to a genre often relegated to the cultural dustbin.

Bungie Studios


Defining work: The Halo series (2001-2009)

Why they’re on the list: Considered the Xbox’s “killer app” and largely credited with the initial success of both the original console and the Xbox 360, the influence of developer Bungie’s Halo series on the next generation of first-person shooters cannot be underestimated. Breaking records with each new installment in the franchise, 2007’s Halo 3 grossed $170 million in its first 24 hours of release, a feat even Hollywood had never managed. The series has gone on to spawn five bestselling novels, two graphic novels, and countless other associated merchandise. The film version, now postponed indefinitely, has attracted the likes of Guillermo del Toro, Neil Blomkamp, and Peter Jackson to the table. Undoubtedly, it’s become one of the most successful franchises ever, in any medium.

Guillermo del Toro


Defining work: Pan’s Labyrinth (2006)

Why he’s on the list: With The Devil’s Backbone del Toro proved there were still visionaries left in the horror genre. With Hellboy and its sequel he demonstrated that he could meld his unique sensibilities with a large-scale Hollywood production. With Pan’s Labyrinth he created a modern-day classic that shattered boundaries. Like The Silence of the Lambs before it, his Franco-era dark fantasy became the rare horror film to transform into a year-end critical darling and major awards contender.

Michael C. Hall/Daniel Cerone/Clyde Phillips


Defining work: Dexter (2006-2009)

The creative team behind the hit Showtime series about a blood-spatter expert/serial killer with a moral grounding are responsible for creating a genuine word-of-mouth sensation. While exec-producers Cerone and Phillips have exited the series (Cerone after the second season and Phillips after the fourth), Hall may be the man most responsible for the show’s success. He has accomplished what few actors could with his darkly humorous portrayal of the titular character: he’s made a serial killer likable. The fourth-season finale of the show became the most-watched single episode on Showtime ever. Water-coolers are buzzing.

Maynard James Keenan (Tool/A Perfect Circle)


Defining work: Lateralus (2001)

Why he’s on the list: While Tool may have come of age in the `90s, their greatest influence wouldn’t be seen until the `00s, upon the release of the double-platinum-selling Lateralus. The progressive tendencies of the band were carried to their logical extreme with this album, which cemented their status as the Radiohead of prog-metal. Of course, lead singer and creative force Maynard James Keenan didn’t rest on his laurels during the band’s long hiatus leading up to 2006’s 10,000 Days; his formation of platinum-selling A Perfect Circle with guitarist Billy Howerdel early this decade gave us the rare side project that nearly lives up to its forebear.

Robert Kirkman/Tony Moore/Charlie Adlard


Defining work: The Walking Dead series (2003-2009)

Robert Kirkman’s critically-acclaimed Walking Dead series brought a level of sophistication to the zombie sub-genre rarely seen in comic books, with a plot as focused on its human characters as on the guts and decapitations. Tony Moore set the tone with his award-winning black-and-white artwork in the first six issues; Charlie Adlard took over after the sixth issue (although Moore continued to draw the covers through issue #24). Kirkman has translated the series’ success to the television format, with a planned AMC series executive-produced by Frank Darabont set to debut next year.

Michael Bay


Defining work: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake (2003)

Why he’s on the list: Facts are facts, no matter how painful they may be. And the fact is, no one person was more responsible for the glut of horror movie remakes in the `00s than Michael Bay. They may not be works of art; they may even represent a cynical cash grab (duh). But there’s no denying that Bay is the instigator of the most pervasive trend in the horror genre over the last ten years (and the man most burned in effigy by fanboys). There’s certainly something to be said for that.

Mastodon


Defining work: Leviathan (2004)

Taking the world of metal (not to mention the music industry as a whole) by storm upon its release in 2004, Leviathan is considered by many the pinnacle of progressive metal band Mastodon’s oeuvre thus far. The heaviness and dark themes of the band’s previous work was combined with polished melodies on the Moby Dick-inspired concept album, the result of which was a work that defied easy description. With Blood Mountain and this year’s Crack the Skye, the band has followed through on their early promise and brought mainstream critical acceptance back to heavy metal.

Cormac McCarthy


Defining work: The Road (2007)

It may seem strange to include an author who has been releasing novels for over 40 years on a list of movers and shakers in the `00s, but Cormac Mccarthy’s 2007 The Road not only earned him the Pulitzer Prize, it became an Oprah Book Club selection and subsequently shot onto bestseller lists. Considering that the book tells an exceedingly dark tale, detailing a bleak post-apocalyptic world and horrific acts of cannibalism, these twin feats (not to mention that the novel was adapted into a major, awards-bait Hollywood film) are all the more impressive.

Stephanie Meyer


Defining work: The Twilight series (2005-2008)

Second only to the Harry Potter phenomenon this decade, Stephanie Meyer’s young-adult vampire series has sold over 85 million copies worldwide (and counting). While critics can gripe about the books’ literary merits and horror fans can bitch that the series shouldn’t be covered in the horror film press (this website included), the massive success and influence of the franchise on pop culture is undeniable. The copycats are rising up in droves (see shameless coattail-rider The Vampire Diaries), but none of them have a chance in hell of topping Meyers’ monolithic achievement.

Takashi Miike


Defining work: Audition (2000)

Why he’s on the list: Ever the prolific auteur, Miike has directed over 40 films since the beginning of the decade (that’s four films a year). The sadistic and unnerving Audition may have put him on the map in the States, but the films subsequent to it proved he wasn’t just a one-hit sensation. While he was often lumped in with the J-Horror trend, the controversial director has subsequently proven his worth as a stand-alone brand.

My Chemical Romance


Defining work: The Black Parade (2006)

Why they’re on the list: One of the musical acts most associated with the “emo” movement, My Chemical Romance also perfected what’s been termed the “neo-goth” aesthetic in their performance image. Sure, the band is radio-friendly “punk-lite” more than anything, their music only a shade removed from the likes of Fall Out Boy. But the pop hooks are utilized in service of dark lyrics dealing with somber issues like death, murder, loss and tragic love affairs. By the time concept album The Black Parade was released in 2006, lead singer Gerard Way had become a pinup boy for 13-year-old goth girls everywhere.

Steve Niles


Defining work: 30 Days of Night (2002)

Possibly more than any other comic book writer this decade, Steve Niles is responsible for bringing the horror genre back to prominence in the world of comics in the `00s. Gory vampire fable 30 Days of Night (co-created by artist Ben Templesmith) proved to be his breakout success, spawning a series of successful follow-ups and a well-received Hollywood film directed by David Slade. Other adaptations of Niles’ work on the horizon include 30 Days of Night direct-to-DVD sequel Dark Days, Wake the Dead with Jay Russell attached to direct, and Freaks of the Heartland helmed by David Gordon Green.

Oren Peli


Defining work: Paranormal Activity (2009)

Why he’s on the list: Much like The Blair Witch Project at the end of the last decade, Oren Peli’s Paranormal Activity sent the message to Hollywood (again) that bigger doesn’t necessarily equal better. Some might say the kudos are premature, but consider this: an entire new division dedicated to nurturing films made for under $100,000 was created at Paramount due to his movie’s success. Not to mention that despite the inevitable backlash, Peli crafted a pretty good flick.

Robert Rodriguez/Quentin Tarantino


Defining work: Grindhouse (2007)

Why they’re on the list: You could try to separate these two filmmakers into their own individual mentions, but it wouldn’t make much sense considering that their Grindhouse collaboration represented the ultimate expression of their mutual obsessions. While the two films were quite different stylistically, the directors’ love of Z-budget exploitation filmmaking was of a piece. The double-feature flopped upon its release, but it’s subsequently become a midnight-show favorite at theaters across the country. Like its shoestring inspirations, the film has become a cult classic all its own. Separately, the two directors’ towering 21st century genre achievements came in the form of Kill Bill (Tarantino) and Sin City (Rodriguez).

Eli Roth


Defining work: Hostel (2006)

Why he’s on the list: While Saw reeled in audiences with its traps and mind games, Roth stripped the sub-genre labeled by the media as “torture-porn” to its bare essentials with Hostel. With that film and its follow-up, along with his earlier indie hit Cabin Fever, he showed a flair for tongue-in-cheek humor that was completely lost on his most adamant critics. Hordes of cheap imitators followed in his wake.

Slipknot


Defining work: Slipknot (1999)

Why they’re on the list: Following in the theatrical footsteps of groups like Kiss, Gwar, and Insane Clown Posse, Slipknot catered to the horror crowd by integrating horror movie-inspired masks into their image and stage show. Some saw it as a gimmick, but the band nevertheless managed to turn out four solid metal albums in the last ten years that proved to be both critical and commercial successes. At the same time, they provided further proof of the horror community’s buying power in the music business.

System of a Down


Defining work: Toxicity (2002)

Why they’re on the list: Amidst the barrage of weak, “nu-metal” acts like Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park and Staind that were unleashed upon the listening public in the late `90s and early `00s, System of a Down broke the mold with their brand of wildly unhinged, neo-gothic alt-metal. Following on the heels of their well-received self-titled debut, Toxicity proved to be their breakthrough album; lead singer Serj Tankian’s guttural growl sounded like a rallying cry in the wake of Fred Durst’s frat-boy whine. Twin album follow-ups Mezmerize and Hypnotize upped the insanity quotient even further and went on to become platinum-certified best-sellers.

Team Silent


Defining work: The Silent Hill series (1999-2009)

While they haven’t attained the mega-selling status of more action-packed video-game franchises such as Resident Evil and Left 4 Dead, the Silent Hill series introduced a unique psychological depth into the arena of horror-themed video games that hadn’t really been seen before. Team Silent, the staff responsible for the first four titles in the ongoing series, crafted a truly unnerving atmosphere that more than any game before or since approximated the feel of walking through a horror film.

Valve Corporation


Defining work: Half-Life 2 (2004)

It’s been a good decade for the folks over at Valve. In 2004 their highly-anticipated, long-in-the-making sequel Half-Life 2 sold millions of units and won many top awards in the video game industry. Following on the heels of this success, the co-op video game Left 4 Dead and its follow-up Left 4 Dead 2 have become hugely popular first-person shooters. This is due in part to the integration of the artificial intelligence component coined “The Director”, which gives vidders a truly cinematic experience during gameplay. The sales of the first entry were more than doubled by follow-up Left 4 Dead 2 last month, giving the developer another viable franchise.

Rob Zombie


Defining work: The Devil’s Rejects (2005)

Why he’s on the list: Few could have anticipated that House of 1,000 Corpses would be such an assured entry into directing for the monster-obsessed musician; fewer still could have predicted the mainstream critical respect he would garner with The Devil’s Rejects. His remake of Halloween was simultaneously loved and reviled by horror fans, but in a decade of watered-down, faceless PG-13 fare he at least had the audacity to follow through on his Southern-fried vision. In the process he revived horror’s punk-rock spirit.

James Wan/Leigh Wannell/Darren Lynn Bousman


Defining work: The Saw franchise (2004-2009)

Why they’re on the list: Produced for $1.2 million, Saw was a shot in the arm to lovers of gore everywhere upon its release in October of 2004. Masterminds James Wan and Leigh Wannell, more than anyone this decade, revitalized the horror genre and made it marketable again. For his part, Darren Lynn Bousman took the reins with aplomb and became a major creative force in the series as director of the first three sequels. Five years after its debut, the franchise has become the highest-grossing in horror history.

Edgar Wright


Defining work: Shaun of the Dead (2004)

Why he’s on the list: When it was released with little marketing in April of 2004, Edgar Wright’s Shaun of the Dead was barely a blip on the pop cultural radar. That’s before it went on to become one of the most successful horror comedies of all time. He’s since inspired a slew of imitators, but compared to the razor-sharp wit of Shaun, they cut about as deep as butter knives (although some would argue Zombieland came close to matching it).

Advertisement
Click to comment

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading