H2: Halloween 2 (2009) - BLOODY-DISGUSTING

!Viva Hate! · 09-03-2007, 04:53 PM

Since this is not referencing the already released Rob Zombie film, and instead the inevitable sequel, there is no good reason for this to be locked like the rest of the threads...

I hear the sequel is already being planned to be released by next year at the same time...

Considering McDowell signed, or so he said, a three picture contract it's needless to say that in some form or another Loomis will be returning as well as Michael...

KINGHORROR · 09-03-2007, 04:55 PM

sorry to burst your bubble (altho I may very well be wrong) but I heard that there will be no more Halloween.

licata1708 · 09-03-2007, 04:55 PM

McDowell must be doing what the guy in your sig is to sign on for a sequel........must have been doing that for a long, long time.

superfry · 09-03-2007, 04:55 PM

This is what I've heard:

From Fangoria.com:

September 3: No more HALLOWEEN?

In its coverage of the excellent box office posted by Rob Zombie’s HALLOWEEN this past weekend (see our item here), The Hollywood Reporter queried Bob Weinstein, head of distributor Dimension, about whether its success would lead to the inevitable sequel. Surprisingly, Weinstein replied it was doubtful. “I never say never never…but it would have to be something very, very different,” he told the trade. Of course, it’s hard to imagine Dimension won’t want to follow up such a profitable picture (HALLOWEEN cost only $15 million to make)—and it’s also doubtful the company would take the next film in a Michael Myers-less direction, given the box-office indifference and fan brickbats that greeted HALLOWEEN III back in 1982. For his part, Zombie has said he won’t be back for another installment. We’ll keep you posted on any new developments. —Michael Gingold

!Viva Hate! · 09-03-2007, 04:58 PM

I don't believe that...

I believe they said it...but I don't believe they mean it. It's a business...and if they can make money off of something you can be damn sure they'll milk it for a profit as long as they can...

I mean, look at Saw!

superfry · 09-03-2007, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Viva Hate!

I don't believe that...

I believe they said it...but I don't believe they mean it. It's a business...and if they can make money off of something you can be damn sure they'll milk it for a profit as long as they can...

I mean, look at Saw!

Oh, I'm almost positive that HALLOWEEN will be back.

Just not zombie, and it probably won't be a direct sequel to his piece of shit either. Thank GOD!

Halloween_Night · 09-03-2007, 05:13 PM

I think they are saying that cause not to many good reviews were given, so they trying to play it quiet, but there gotta be a Halloween 2, it gotta be

GoliathSlasher · 09-03-2007, 06:58 PM

their going to have another one duh! because look at the boxoffice, thats one reason for a sequel.. look at saw, they are all shit movies, but always pull in $. halloween is not only a good movie (unlike saw) but it can pull in the money on a terrible boxoffice weekend. im all for a halloween2

GoliathSlasher · 09-03-2007, 06:58 PM

sorry to be repetitive, didnt see the earlier saw post.

SlayerX · 09-03-2007, 06:59 PM

This thread is as worthless as Rob Zombie's Halloween.