You have to be logged in to comment! If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.
Posted By: iNSANEmoments at 3:21am, November 8, 2009
I vaguely remember watching this.
Simply put, if I can't remember it, it must have been not that great. Still, watch it if you must. From what I remember, it had its good points.
Posted By: Horroraddikt at 12:41am, September 21, 2009
I turened it off halfway through..was terrible.,don't bother at all with this tripe.
Bill Moseley was the only positive.
Posted By: bloodnguts313 at 3:39pm, September 13, 2009
This movie is ok just not as good as it should have and should have never went to the thearters and the end sucked bad. Pritty good but if you dont like sad boring parts then this isnt your movie.
What could of been the best horror movie of the year turned out to be a huge disappointment to me. It was too preachy and the characters were whinny, unlikable and were always bickering at each other that you wanted something to happen to them, no one to really root for here. I almost don't want to call it a horror movie because there wasn't any scares, gore, suspense, or thrilling and even creepy moments for me. I do think it has nice production values and wasn't bad enough for me to walk out of the theater but this was a weak excuse for a horror movie, it was boring for me! I can't believe this got released to theaters while many deserving horror movies are waiting to get a release date or got dumped to dvd, that's just stupidity! Overall it's a forgettable, underwhelming horror movie that I don't even recommend you to watch even once, poor!
Honestly, the only high point to this movie was the fact it had Bill Moseley and Michael Madsen in it, but Michael is barely in it at all, yet his name is first, and Bill Moseley is weird, as always :D. But besides the 2 of them the movie sucked ass and was boring as sh**. There was a point when it could have been good, but then it just went the wrong way and SUCKED!!!! I wasted my money going to this movie, which I thought was R and it said R but the only reason it was R was maybe alittle swearing or something, there was no blood and really nothing happening at all. Do not see this movie, you will f***ing regret it, just look at the other reviews, im not the only one, if you like this movie ur retarded. 2/10!
I don't care if it's based on a book, there's already a horror movie called House; which is totally rad and often overshadowed. We do not need blemishes in the genre, such as this, getting people confused. These is only one House in my opinion and it's not this stinking hunk of poo.
This movie sucked! The story was bad, characters and plot lines just start in the middle and there is no explanation or detail about anything. I wish I could have the 88 friggin minutes back!
I haven't seen the movie yet but I've read the book and I wasn't overly impressed by it. Usually if I'm not impressed with the book I'm not going to be impressed by the movie either. I think I'll skip this one.
Perretti is usually a great author with creative story lines but this one was pretty bland and predictable.
Perretti's "Monster" or "The Oath" are much better books.
Posted By: gemmanmike at 7:28pm, November 10, 2008
While not bloody or profane "House is still a nice creepy haunted house type movie. The only thing is, it really helps if you have read the book first then see the movie as some of the confusing parts (like the little girl) will make more sense and you HAVE to approach this movie with at least a little bit of a religeous view point in order for the ending to make any kind of sense at all. Ted Dekker is one of the best writers out there since King and Koontz (check out the Circle trilogy "Black," "White," and "Red" very Matrix like) and I thought that this movie was a very nice change from the norm.
Posted By: yeonightmare at 5:24pm, November 8, 2008
This movie failed to keep my interest. I never felt anything for the characters, I actually dis-liked some of them. The ending was confusing...i know its just a movie, but wouldnt the poilice officer, or the paramedics recognize they are talking to people that look identical to the ones dead on the ground. Didnt scare me, the old lady was the creepiest. Glad i watched the movie for free on the internet and didnt spend money on it
Posted By: MamaLukuBuku at 12:02pm, November 8, 2008
I liked this movie. I thought the ending was quite hackneyed but the rest of the movie had a good creepy atmosphere. I am not one for "ghost" movies but this one was pretty cool to say the least.
Posted By: dherna7704 at 11:31pm, November 7, 2008
crappy
Posted By: DekkerHead07 at 11:28pm, November 7, 2008
I have watched this movie and I didn't think it was that bad of a movie. I don't know what you're talking about preachiness...Jesus was never mentioned in the movie. People today who watch horror are all about blood, gore, nudity...if you like that stuff watch Hostel again. Hostel got old fast as I watched it. it wasn't anything new. Just more blood and gore. At least House kept up with the psychological tension.
House is about two couples stranded at a run down bed-n'-breakfast in the backwoods of Alabama. The proprietors of the house are very...er...strange and a killer called The Tin Man is striving to get inside and demands one dead body by dawn or everyone dies.
I thought it was cleverly put together and held its tension all through the movie very well. I also enjoyed the twist ending that was altered from the book. Very well done but a bit too talky...NOT PREACHY...talky.
The film resembled nothing like a Christian movie at all except the bible verse at the beginning and the "Light destroys dark," line thrown in towards the end...and you call that preachy? The Exorcist was more preachy than that! Anyways...I thought that about 98% of the sfx and vfx were great. Much better than the movie Thr3e before this.
The only thing that kept my rating of this movie at a 7 is the editing towards the end. It started getting all "Saw" like editing and it should've paced itself better. Let the actors carry the tension like they have been doing. The acting wasn't great but it was better than other crappy movies I've seen.
Otherwise, House is a psychological mind twist that's ultimatly about facing all the wrong things you've done in your life and facing your fears. More movies should be about that instead of just pointless violence. Like I said, it gets old after a while. That's why Hostel: Part II did so bad...it got old. Same ole', same ole'. House is a bit of flavor that we've been missing from the genre with a little bit of B-movie campiness just for fun.
Posted By: draculaghost at 10:32pm, November 7, 2008
Very bad
Posted By: draculaghost at 10:32pm, November 7, 2008
Very bad
Posted By: draculaghost at 10:32pm, November 7, 2008
Very bad
Posted By: DJ_Frenchy666 at 9:43pm, November 7, 2008
Posted By: rickdunn101 at 2:43pm, November 7, 2008
Produced by Namesake Entertainment, an Evangelical film production company, House is a religious film masquerading as a horror film. Four "sinners" are trapped in a House and must figure a way out. How does one get out? Be a good Christian. The sinners are a young couple who didn't pay enough attention to their young daughter (who drowns as a result.) A woman - who as a child killed the man sexually abusing her. A man - who as a teenager killed his abusive father. I'm not kidding. The film also didn't earn an R-rating (there's no nudity, swearing or graphic violence). This is absolute garbage. Evangelicals always accuse others of hidden agendas, but this is exactly what they're guilty of.
Posted By: thedescent08 at 9:09am, November 7, 2008
Atrocious movie. Incredibly stupid message.
THE HORROR HYPE METER Excited to see this movie? Rate it here!
