Craving brains? We can help!
Login or Join The Infected with a FREE account!
User Name: Password:
NEWS REVIEWS COMING SOON INTERVIEWS BDTV VIDEO MOVIE PIT ARTICLES
FORUMS BLOGS USER GALLERIES THE INFECTED ABOUT US NEWS FEEDS PODCASTS

A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge

Release Date: December 1984
Director: Jack Sholder
Writer: David Chaskin
Starring: Mark Patton Kim Myers Robert Rusler Clu Gulager Hope Lange
Studio: New Line Cinema
Rating:
Official Site: Click Here

Official Score
No Review Available

Average User Rating


Read 11 User Reviews


You have to be logged in to comment!
If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.


USERNAME:
PASSWORD:




Posted By: Turk3102 at 2:25pm, December 1, 2008

This movie was so bad, it makes me sad to think that they sat back, and made more of them because of the success of this sack of shit. I'd rather watch Barney than this crap again.


Posted By: Ed Gein at 9:15pm, October 23, 2008

One of the worst horror sequels ever.


Posted By: dherna7704 at 2:18am, October 9, 2008

great


Posted By: downward_spiral at 4:22pm, October 8, 2008

Not a very good sequel to the original.


Posted By: dorkinb at 12:25pm, August 15, 2008

I was in too it!, but didnt start watching in expectation that it was gogin to be an awesome story line, you have to enjoy it for what it is! FREDDY!


Posted By: MichaelMyers1031 at 4:50pm, August 8, 2008

This is one of the major disappointments in all of the Nightmare films in my opinion the worst. Good god one of the worst story's ever why the F*ck does he have to pick the absolute idiotic teenager to take over this is a major major disappointment. By far the worst thing is the plot. This film is TERRIBLE!!!


Posted By: Anthropophagus at 3:56am, August 2, 2008

This film is absolutely terrible. Robert Englund's appearance as Freddy Krueger is just as memorable as all his appearances so there's no problems there, it's just the film is drenched in absolutely appalling acting and stupid plot.


Posted By: jpugly13 at 6:58pm, May 29, 2008

This movie while not as good as the first is still alright. The first time i watched it i was like what the hell. Since then i have watched it more and it is ok. Tried to go this whole other route, that was unnecessary. The movie was good and crazy and just alot of madness.


Posted By: sixxchik at 5:19pm, May 16, 2008

im sorry but this movie sucked big time


Posted By: QueenOfHalloween at 12:38pm, March 19, 2008

Ok sequel, no where near as scary as the original.


Posted By: GGoblin31 at 11:08am, March 18, 2008

A big step DOWN from Craven's original, but at least Jack Sholder and company are trying to make 'Freddy's Revenge' a scary flick. At times the film makes no sense (exploding parakeets; pool party Freddy; leather-clad gym teachers), but isn;t that the point of the 'Nightmare' movies? The blurring of reality is running rampant in this one. Kudos to Kevin Yeager's Freddy makeup. This is a weird one, kids. I like to call this the 'Twin Peaks' of the 'Nightmare' films.



THE HORROR HYPE METER
Excited to see this movie? Rate it here!

   1 Star

2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars

Total Votes:

Average Rating:

65


HORROR NEWS
Main
DVD
Indie
Video Games
Comic Books
MOVIES
Reviews
Coming Soon
Trailers
Movie Pit
FEATURES
Interviews
Articles
Podcasts
Dead Pixels
Graphic Content
COMMUNITY
My Profile
The Infected
Forums
Blogs
Galleries
ABOUT US
BD Staff
Contact Us
News Feeds
Advertise

BLOODYDISGUSTING.COM/BLOODY-DISGUSTING.COM, GOHORRORMOVIES.COM © 2001-2008 BLOODY-DISGUSTING LLC - Privacy Policy - Terms Of Service