You have to be logged in to comment! If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.
Not much to say for this movie, I really did not get into the characters like I would have, It did not have enough build to it. It was very atmospheric but that's about it.
I wasn't expecting much from this movie and i ws pleasantly surprised!!!! The acting is pretty good especially from Gina Phillips and the story actually keeps you interested!!! Cutter was a coll creature and killer and I really got into the story of the plague...This movie maked you feel paranoid much like The Descent but not as paranoid as The Descent...there is a decent amount of blood flow..i had to look away on the part where the pregnant ladies stomach was cut open...this movie is good could have been better but a decent supernatural slasher thriller
Posted By: spilnkspawn at 8:35pm, January 25, 2009
I really enjoyed the movie, great twist, great chill factor, and a very good one for those new to the genre. . .and I din't have a problem with it either, great choice of scenery. . .I could have done without the baby part, but that is all part of the experience
This was not a very good movie with ghosts who were not scary, hard to understand accents, and scenes flashing back and forth. Gore was minimal and I really didn't care who died. Gina Phillips couldn't save this either. The director tried too hard to scare you and it doesn't work. Not worth watching even once.
I thought this was rather surprising. I enjoyed the film quite a lot. I don't believe I've seen anything from this director, but for what was created from what was obviously quite a restricted budget I was very impressed. The film's cinematography was very well done about 95% of the time with an ethereal, deep blue tint to the film. There were points were the shots were a little grainy, which in this case only enhanced the lack of production, though only minimally. I have to say my favorite horror film, "Inside" seems to have this little problem. I'm not a camera expert but I wonder if it's because of shooting in digital or what. Maybe not... aaaa, but for a ghost and goul movie, this was pleasingly effective. I'm usually one not to like these types as they usually lack intensity and most of all blood and gore. But this kept a nice pace, with a lot going on. The tension was well executed in the film, and there is a little blood and gore here and there for us gorehounds but, though the blood looked decent (I happen to like the effect black blood has, this is objective), there was a nasty worm scene that was definately subpar due to crappy CGI production. The Monster in this flick was awesome and very original. Eight foot tall skinny crow/priest ghost, now that's imagery. Acting was up to par. I thought the acting surpassed what normally would be expected of a film with this budget. Overall, don't listen to BD... I thought it was well worth your money, and I never give credit to crappy suckfests, trust me.
THE HORROR HYPE METER Excited to see this movie? Rate it here!
