Need an Account? Sign Up
 

Automaton Transfusion (V)

Release Date: March 04, 2008
Director: Steven C. Miller
Writer: Steven C. Miller
Starring: Garrett Jones Juliet Reeves William Howard Bowman Rowan Bousaid Ashley Elizabeth Pierce
Studio: Dimension Extreme
Rating:
Official Site: Click Here

Official Score


Average User Rating


Read 64 User Reviews


You have to be logged in to comment!
If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.


USERNAME:
PASSWORD:




Posted By: GRUDGE4life at 12:11pm, June 14, 2009

alright first off i do have to say that this movie was dissappointing at most and it did have a lot of very bad things about it, but the gore was good and Mr. Miller knows what he is doing...that said i have to give this film props for actually being a good zombie film despite what all these negative nancy's have to say about it...
if you can at least rent it and just watch it and not judge it...dear gooodness people!



Posted By: IWRS at 12:39am, June 1, 2009

I will not even go into detail about how incredibly bad this movie is. Ah, what the hell, horrid acting, bad filming, terrible and meaningless plot that tries to be made up for with an overload of poorly done gore.

Ive already spent too much time on this one. I think most of the reviews speaks for this film.

Stay away!!



Posted By: VincenzoPescado at 7:08pm, April 3, 2009

Wow. Unbelievably bad.

And not an automaton in sight.



Posted By: leechcode5 at 5:02am, March 28, 2009

Ok, I just watched the worst zombie movie I've ever seen. I know it was an indie film done on a ridiculously low budget, but there's nothing really redeeming about this movie a all. Some decent gore effects, sure, when the camera stops shaking and quick-cutting to let you see them. Otherwise, there's no character developement... hell, there are no characters. There are people, and they talk, but they are completely interchangeable. New ones pop up here and there to either provide exposition or just die really quick. The plot is beyond paper-thin, the few quick bits that were at all interesting were ripped off from other movies, and nothing is resolved. This isn't a movie, its a collection of shots that only barely connect, tell about ten minutes of story stretched to over an hour, and then... To Be Continued. Seriously, to hell with this movie.


Posted By: leatherfacekillserinfan1 at 10:54pm, March 26, 2009

I cannot believe all the bad reviews on this site...i loved this movie...Automaton Transfusion is the first of a planned trilogy that will leave you hooked on for the next...Automaton Transfusion stars very the very pretty Juliet Reeves and the super sexy Garret Jones...The movie stats off in a hospital where we see a new employee get bitten by a zombie and pulled into a morgue thingy...than cut to a high school with three geeks(although garret Jones couldn't possibly really be a high school geek because of how sexy he is) getting beat up by the popular jocks and getting laughed at by all the girls while garret Jones and Juliet reeves are making out in garret's car...eventually one of the teachers is bitten by a kid and ambulance comes and takes him to the hospital..later that afternoon Juliet Reeves goes to a party with her friends and Garret Jones and his friends go to a bar where they are attacked by zombies...Garret and his friends then go back, get Juliet reeves and try to get help by going back to their school...First of all for a low budget movie this movie looks really good..there is a lot of blood flow and the acting is so-so.It lets us know the characters who they are and what they are like...thhe soundtrack at the beginning is amazing and one of the reasons i got hooked on this movie... It takes a while for the horror to start I'd say about half an hour and than the movie picks up and never lets you go and by the end along with a very good explanation about how the zombies came to be this movie will leave you ready for the sequel...to me this movie is way better than 28 days and weeks later by a longshot!!!!


Posted By: JohnnyHorror30 at 11:45pm, March 22, 2009

I dont think this movie comes even close to danny boyles hit films 28 days and weeks later. I was bored as all hell and had to hit the fast foward button to the end so i could stop the misery of sudden boredness, they arteries in my neck hardly had any blood pumping through them i was so bored of this movie. I even felt bad for my dvd player because I was running it dry using fast foward. To many good zombie movies out there so stick with Romero's or Boyles films.


Posted By: slipknot611 at 1:47pm, March 11, 2009

It started bad... it continued along those lines for another 70 minutes or so... it ended bad. All I'm sayin'.


Posted By: Psycho78 at 12:11pm, March 11, 2009

i wish i'd never seen this movie, what a waste!


Posted By: Zombie_Orgullo at 12:21am, March 11, 2009

I cannot believe the blurbs that this website attached to this movie.....The Holy Grail of true independent horror films.....One of the best zombie films in Decades......?????
WTF !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Did your mom make this P.O.S. ?
I'm all for independent film makers and wholly support their efforts but for you guys to credit this film the way you did is sad. Maybe you should watch the film before you give a blurb, I just have a feeling that you owed this film a favor and you tossed it some icing to cover the bad taste it leaves. I have read your reviews for awhile now and usually trust your judgement but when convincing fans that this is gold , fork out the cash, well ya struck out! I can't even rate it a ONE because your rating system doesnt allow ONES. disappointed....



Posted By: Supernaut at 3:43am, March 4, 2009

"AUTOMATON TRANSFUSION is the Holy Grail of “true” independent horror films"-PLEASE! It's actually the "High School Musical" of Indi Horror.

I'm all for indi films, but "independent" can't be a euphamism for "garbage". The film abuses the "shaky cam" technique to cover up the utter thinness of this film. The obligatory "it's the military's fault we have all these darn zombies" scene sums up the entire film- cliched, stiff and half-baked.

I feel a bit bad taking a swipe at an indi, but my take on this film is that Dimension Extreme just through it out there with it's logo on it to see if it would sell. My problem here is really with DE, not the filmakers, for pushing such a poor film.



Posted By: kick in da balls at 4:56pm, March 3, 2009

Steven c miller is a great guy.He`s on facebook and twitter.loves to hear from people about his movies good and bad.

plus he told me who he`s eyeing for the lead in motel hell,but thats hush hush.

i`ll just say shes in a tv show that started last year.



Posted By: randomrick at 1:33pm, March 3, 2009

I hate movies that look like they were sot in my backyard! bad everything!


Posted By: RyanSnake at 10:14pm, February 26, 2009

I killed myself after watching this movie. Now... I'm back from the dead and making sure that everyone knows - this movie sucks my balls.


Posted By: Necronatalusz at 4:43pm, February 22, 2009

The gore and movie was excellent for a low-budget movie.


Posted By: Mushroom at 2:05pm, February 21, 2009

This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I understand it was low budget but some of it was just ridiculous. Large amounts of blood does not mean gore. It was a sad excuse for a zombie movie. It was more like a beat-up, pissed-off, cannibal movie. The scene that killed me the most was the one where they are "ripping" the intestines out of a girl and the camera man zooms back over her body to reveal a fully intact stomach. Anyone planning on seeing this, just don't. You money is best put elsewhere.


Posted By: Malcolm T Grindhouse at 8:17pm, February 19, 2009

valiant effort


Posted By: Dr.Hyde_666 at 8:13pm, February 19, 2009

Wow... i don't know where to begin...pretty bad Zombie film...but damn did they do it good!!! I give these guys awesome credit for doing what they did on such a micro budget!


Posted By: Slaser Maniac at 7:59pm, February 19, 2009

It was another low-budget with very bad acting. But it was the best zombie low-budgets. It had good speacial effects and the blood was good. But you can't get the thought out of your head that it's a low-budget. A good zombie, not the best, but if you like low-budgets, then watch it.


Posted By: weasel corpse 666 at 10:11pm, February 14, 2009

Not bad for a movie with a twenty dollar budget


Posted By: SnuFFy at 4:53pm, January 12, 2009

Fuckin hated the ending. And the fact that all the audio was dubbed over the original recording was extremely off-putting.

Really a shame, such potential was there for this movie.



Posted By: Anyanka at 3:30pm, January 12, 2009

Upon first watching this, I thought it was a really good movie.

My second viewing was not as kind to it.

I do think it has some really great parts; a zombie reaching into a pregnant teenager and eating her fetus! Awesome!!

There were some parts that drag on forever; the car ride to the bar.

I didn't understand the sleeping zombies either, what the hell? How can they need sleep?

Overall I did enjoy this movie and would suggest it to any fan of zombie films.



Posted By: CrittersWrangler01 at 8:34pm, December 25, 2008

WTF?? I rented this because the trailer and the case looked good, but this was horrible!! its gore was good but thats it. story, acting, budget...all terrible. So pass this one up at all cost!!


Posted By: Kane86 at 12:22pm, December 18, 2008

This movie blew my mine. How the took very little money and made the look of big budget movie but was actually done on a small scale. Minsue a few pros and cons. But all in all i find a good little romp. I own it but if you don't its definitely worth a rent.


Posted By: coffinjoe at 11:05am, December 18, 2008

I bought this movie based on a certain websites hype. What an awefully disappointing piece of crap. Where do I start? Technically, the camera work was bad. It looks all shaky and washed out. Did they shoot this with a Nokia or Motorolla cell phone? The box say anamorphic wide screen and it is not. As far as the film itself goes: nothing original here. Running Zombies, lots of over the top gore (which does not save it), bad acting, a token black guy. If you want to watch a good zombie film, watch Dawn of the Dead (original recipe or remake) or Return of the Living Dead. Automaton Transfusion is not what you want. If you just have to see it: rental, netflix or borrow it from an idiot like me that bought it.


Posted By: DarthVader_85 at 3:05am, December 5, 2008

I loved this movie. The camera work is a little different and I was skeptical at first, but three minutes in I was hooked. I always say that i love bad horror movies, and thats what I expected out of this... another bad horror movie to laugh through. But I was pleasantly suprised. The effects are awesome when you consider the budget, and even if you don't, they still look good. The main actor does very well, as well as a few of the others, but as in all b level horror movies, the actresses sucked. But it's expected.

The main part of the story doesn't really come into play for a while, but there's enough going on that it makes it a fun movie to watch, and definetly something I'll watch again as well as recommend to fellow horror and zombie fans.

And on a side note... the soundtrack kicked ass.



Posted By: goodroy at 3:16pm, December 3, 2008

It kinda felt like watching an even worse episode of MTV's the HILLS, but with ugly kids. Terrible film making all around. The dialogue kicked in and all I could think was..."really?...But I paid."


Posted By: ghostslasher13 at 4:35pm, November 28, 2008

This is horrible. I once thought Zombie Lake was a bad film but his is much worse. Anyone who thinks this is a good zombie film has bad taste and coming from someone who likes movies that are so bad they are good that's bad. This movie deserves all the hate in the world.


Posted By: antropophagus at 9:55am, November 28, 2008

Well, what can I say?

I love zombie movies, not just the high budgets movies from Romero (for example). I don't care if it's low budget as long as it entertains me. Automaton Transfusion did that with me.

I believe that it's a movie worth of watching. I first downloaded this then I bought it 'cause I liked it. The producers/director did a fine job considering the budget they had (something like 30 000$) and the short time they shot it (just over a week). The actors were quite good and the plot wasen't bad either. The movie was a little short, though...and it ended abruptly. But there is a lot og gore in it. And some good sequences. Some people are defining this movie as crap 'cause they didn't like it. I didn't like Starship Troopers 3...doesn't mean it's a bad movie. This is a low budget movie. An independ. An indie...whatever you call it. Don't expect Land of the Dead, Day of the Dead or any other like these.

Anyway, if you want a fast-paced movie with gore in it, give it a try, I think it's a damn good low-budget movie. Better than any Ulli Lommel's movie. Watch it and make your own opinion of it. But I truly think that Bllody-Disgusting made the right comments about this movie.



Posted By: Zandooy at 12:02am, November 28, 2008

Automaton Transfusion didn't even make it onto my list of movies that I can tolerate. I didn't expect a Romero classic but this was just plain pathetic. Absolutely no scare factor and then the movie cuts off so abruptly that I was left wondering where the rest of the movie was. Even movies with a sequel in mind have some sort of conclusion to give you a small sense of gratification. I watched the whole movie waiting for "the good parts" and then all of a sudden "To Be Continued.....". Complete waste of my $9.


Posted By: BK's Finest at 1:53am, November 12, 2008

Good gore and........


Posted By: bigmo_402 at 10:26am, October 16, 2008

When you watch this movie with 4 friends and none of them like it, what does that tell you this movie sucked. Don't waste 85 minutes of your life.


Posted By: Mr. Willson at 12:36am, October 16, 2008

There's probably a reason this is a low budget film. I wouldn't give my money to fund crap, either. This film is abhorrent. I don't care if it's 'indie and low budget' or if they spent a bajillion dollars to make it. If it's garbage, it's garbage. This film is no different. I threw it in the trash the day after I watched it. Not even worthy of being a coaster. What a waste.


Posted By: cricket02 at 7:26pm, October 15, 2008

Where to start...first of all I'm still upset that I spent my hard earned money to rent this from blockbuster. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with severely low budget independent student films, but this was ridiculous.

Low budget does NOT mean the movie has to be bad. I've seen plenty of extremely great low budget horror movies. Automaton Transfusion failed to be one of those. The camera angles were horrible. The script was horrible, and the actors were horrible. Everything was over-dramatic to no effect. Nothing related to anything except for senseless gore which was mediocre at best and didn't even serve to make this movie worth recommending to anyone. Take my advice, if you want a really good scare, want to watch amazing gore, or are just bored and want something to watch, save your money and rent something else.



Posted By: Guitarded at 11:01pm, October 13, 2008

Absolutely phenomenal movie, nevermind the low budget. the Gore was amazing and it didnt even feel like a low budget movie, Cant wait for Contingency


Posted By: loyal_to_none at 6:40pm, October 12, 2008

This movie was terrible. I'd like to know how much cash bloody-disgusting was given to provide quotes for the DVD box. Phrases like "Holy Grail" and "One of the best zombie films in decades" seem to imply that this film would kick ass. Oh, but what a turd it is. I hope the person who wrote these quotes gets a bout of explosive diarrhea the next time he or she sits down to lie about another bad horror movie.


Posted By: VoodooKitchen at 1:57pm, September 22, 2008

Let me start with this ... I watched it once with the director/producer commentary on. It took me about ten lines of dialogue to know I was not going to be able to stand the deliveries of the "badass" and the "sidekick" so I turned them off. With that said, I can not understand the hatred being shown for this movie. It was a full throttle, balls to the walls, independent gem. Maybe I'm biased because I thought the commentary was great. They had a ton of stories and explanations and they were quick to point out their own loopholes, gaffes and problems. The pacing and editing were fantastic. The movie flew by and was over before I knew it.
Now let me get to the true heart of this flick. Absolutely inspired gore. It was red, gooey, chunky and non-stop. Kudos to the filmmakers for putting their budget were it counted the most. They know that the way to a horror fans heart is through an eviscerated corpse or two.
Lastly I would be remiss if I didn't acknowledge the fact that this was shot in 9 ....
that's 9 days and for around 30,000 (unbelievable)
It's also shot much more guerilla style than many other indies that claim that title. Just listen to the commentary for some tales of financial organization and truly dangerous filming.
If you are a fan of the red stuff and can keep in mind the time and budgetary restraints this film was under, make a point of giving it a go. If not, don't bother cause you won't let yourself have any fun with it.



Posted By: napalmfuzz at 12:50am, August 28, 2008

one of the absolute BEST low budget, STV zombie flicks i've ever seen. Cant wait till I get to continue the story.


Posted By: riotsquid1408 at 3:45pm, August 26, 2008

cool


Posted By: jedimaster at 11:46pm, July 31, 2008

all i can say is that i love my zombie films, i love extrememly gory films all the same. the bloodier the better. i was enjoying this film up until the fetus scene. and i thought, whut the fuck, the director either must be retarded or he is the answer to all the dead babies across usa. i'm jus glad i didn't pay much for this, so i was more then happy 2 cook it on my bbq. film was pathetic, and the director is an embarissment to the horror genre


Posted By: phantomdc4 at 2:27am, July 30, 2008

Bloody-Disgusting calls this film "one of the best zombie films in decades," whichever asshole wrote that obviously never even watched it. It is absolutely, by far, the worst movie EVER made. I got this account for one reason and one reason only, I want the person who wrote that review to commit suicide! I hope you commit suicide and you don't come back as a zombie, because frankly, you don't deserve it...


Posted By: vanilla blade at 6:16pm, July 16, 2008

i put it right up there with "children of the living dead", "hell of the living dead" and "hide and creep". not sure which is the all-time worst fucking piece of shit ever made. all i do know is that's a little over an hour of my life i'll regret wasting for a long fucking time. thanks a lot BD, ya dumbass'.


Posted By: rockzhard at 11:52pm, July 15, 2008

was not worth the gas it took to go to the dvd store to rent it. will think long and hard about the next movie BD gives a good prop to. wish the rating click would let me put a minus on it.


Posted By: abe_the_cop at 10:43am, July 8, 2008

I'm not one to say things like "it's good for what it is" because that implies you're holding something high in low expectations and that seems trite to me.

With that said this is a descent independent zombies movie and I feel that Steven Miller has a lot of potential. There are some major faults with it though. An obvious fan and a part of an independent music scene Miller annoyingly puts unnecessary music in awful scenes killing the mood and alienating the audience (hey man I go to, play, and book shows too but I don't want to hear some sceamo metalcore band playing over a prep high school house party). The only reason I mention this is because there is a mood creating music(I'm assuming the string feature on a keyboard because of the low budget) that definitely sets the tone.

The gore was impressive but not nearly as what I thought it was going to be after seeing what other people wrote about it. The acting was mediocre but didn't ruin the movie. There were some good shots but still gave off the impression that they were amateur and the ones he did nail were accidental. Definitely trail and error directing.

Another annoyance I found is that most of the zombies went to the shoot wearing clothes they wouldn't mind getting kero syrup on. I mean everyone is wearing a white or sold color t-shirt. After noticing a legion of zombies in white shirts I was annoyed that nobody thought to change that. Unless this movie was a zombie version of "Grease" they should of been wearing more modern clothes.

The ending was well...disappointing. It's like Miller used his mouse to scroll up whatever apple computer he owns and realized he has a lot of material and no where else to go...thus setting up the definite sequel.

I think Steven Miller has a lot of potential as a writer and as a director. I'm looking forward to his future efforts. I'm just not really sure if I'm going to watch Automaton Transfusion 2.

All in all Automaton Transfusion is Dawn of the Dead(remake) in diapers. But hey in my book thats a compliment. Shit it did trump the master Romero and his god awful Diary of the Dead.



Posted By: suk_a_fuk at 3:49pm, June 29, 2008

I rented this yesterday. My friend and I always get a great kick out of indie horror films, whether they're good or bad. This one, however, was just horrendous. We shut it off about an hour into it. It was painful to watch and listen to. Yes, the gore was good but that's not nearly enough to make it worth while. And I understand that the actors aren't A list actors, but that doesn't give them a reason to overact either. This movie was not enjoyable and from this point forward I'm going to continue pretending that it doesn't exist.


Posted By: WereAllVictims at 9:45pm, June 23, 2008

The gore was pretty impressive for the most part but this movie needs a lot of work...


Posted By: Scurgar at 8:27pm, June 12, 2008

I'll admit that my impression of this movie after the first viewing was pretty low, but after my second viewing I realized movies like this have to be forgiven in certain aspects. It had a very low budget, only 9 days of shooting and actors who were doing their first real motion picture. If you actually pull your head out of your ass and take it for what it's worth, this movie is pretty bitchin' and that's basically what the director and producers were shooting for. The gore effects are fantastic and NOT CGI, unlike another recent zombie movie that was quite shitty *cough* Diary of The Dead *cough*. The only reason I can come up with why this is getting such low ratings is because some of these people haven't seen many indie movies and obviously expect every film they see to be perfect in every way imaginable, which is gay. Yes, it has its flaws, but when taken in context, those flaws are fairly minor. It's a fun, gory ride that every true fan of the genre would enjoy.


Posted By: Lionel Cosgrove at 5:47pm, May 27, 2008

Overrated. The hype killed this movie for me. If I had gone in knowing that I was going to see a digital zombie movie shot by some film students and their friends in 9 days, perhaps I would not have been so critical, but as it goes, typical low-budget zombie fare. Nothing new here.


Posted By: ZombifiedX at 9:58am, May 25, 2008

I watched this movie based on the great review it got from this site. But alas, it was horrible. It had a couple of cool scenes, and I live in central Florida, so when they went to Backbooth I really thought that was awesome. But it was utter crap. What was up with the shaky camera effect? I could hardly stand it. I felt embarrassed to make my friends sit through it. Thanks Bloody Disgusting, thanks a lot.


Posted By: Gory at 3:56am, May 25, 2008

Yes i reposted under my new profile.

Seriously now, we're all horror fans and we've seen the best and the worst -Atleast most of us in such- But that's not the point. The point is that right now the majority rules and the majority as spoken and for the first time i can agree with the majority. This movie sucks, okay if you haven't seen it there will be spoilers in my review and i heed you to read this rather than see it for yourself. But if you are gonna take the chance to watch this shit please do it illegally and download cause you're better off going to prison than watching or paying to watch this shit. The opening scene gives off the appearance of a semi decent film, then it turns into high school fuckin' musical where the film decides to revolve around a group of whiney ass teens. As if we thought teen horror couldn't get any worse huh? Of course with the group of teens we have guess who????? Token the corny black guy who they clearly show has brass knuckles and says the most unusual line after being punked out by the school jock "I'd like to put a chainsaw through his face" or something like that. Guess what???? HE GET'S TOO. Now that would work in a comedy cause it'd be a joke, but come on now a serious horror flick? It gets better, one of the worse and yet memorable scenes is the post party scene where one of the girls is still trapped in the house and being chased by a zombie, her lil group of friends run into the house being chased by a horde of zombies, struggle to keep the door closed, see the girl and the one zombie following her and exit through the same door they entered and we just struggling to keep closed from a horde of dead. Okay again if this were a comedy it would be funny. But this were meant to be a serious film, and if it were meant to be comedy it still failed. Trust me you can get your fix of gore anywhere else cause there isnt much to be impressed by here. The fetus scene i thought was kinda cool, kind caught me off guard in the first place seeing that it's mind you a prego in a party were ppl are smoking and drinking and so on, who mind you doesn't look to prego to begin with, who is suddenly attacked by the one and only zombie there, which sure in a party of about 30 ppl jocks included you would think maybe someone would've had the balls to fight that one zombie off after the first attack but no they all run. Another memorable and bad scene, the city sequence. We all love suspense and build ups and such cause it keeps us watching. But if this scene we trying to achieve that it failed. For us that have seen many a zombie film, we all know once it hits a city are it'll spread out like a plague and chaos would be everywhere so on and so forth. Not here, the city is quiet, clean, and not a single soul nor zombie in sight. That is until our group of protagonist stop and get out of the vehicle and suddenly a group of zombies come from the direction the just came from. Funny,huh? You think they'd be driving around one minute saying "there's something wrong where is everyone" to "hey there's ppl behind us i see them in the review mirror". But then again it's only a movie no one can spot a huge flaw like where the hell did a horde of undead just suddenly emerge from when they should of seen the bastards in the city roaming freely in the first place. "IT'S A FUCKING CITY WHERE'S THE CHAOS" Another shitty scene, when they decide to gather into the high school, yes the school. Seems like a good idea, until the find out the school had been thwarted with the undead as well, who mind you are mostly laying around on the gym floor and in the most predictable of manners sequentially rise. WTF? How can you can more original than that right? Bull shit fucking ass raping donkey dick sucking puss fucks. Another amazingly bad error -seeing this film itself is the worst error of all- is when the explanation come in, it seems the town were there as a government experiment or something, because the government wanted to raise the dead to life in order to have the undead legion fight the wars for the living so we don't lose any of our own. See that i like, "WHEN I SAW THE FIRST TIME IN RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD" All and all do yourself the favor dont watch it, i mean hell some like it and it may be your type of flick but, the script is unintelligible, the cinematography a la 28 days is excruciatingly bad, the acting.... the character development? i can go on. Trust the majority, don't watch. Unless of course you only have a choice of this and house of the dead then i say watch this 50 times over any one of Uwe Bowel's film. Yes i meant to spell it like that. So it shows this isn't the worst flm but still pretty bad, after all i think they worst movie i've ever seen i'd leave nameless =cough cough Tower of blood cough cough= well wether you agree or not this is y review :-P



Posted By: goryoso at 1:28am, May 25, 2008

Seriously now, we're all horror fans and we've seen the best and the worst -Atleast most of us in such- But that's not the point. The point is that right now the majority rules and the majority as spoken and for the first time i can agree with the majority. This movie sucks, okay if you haven't seen it there will be spoilers in my review and i heed you to read this rather than see it for yourself. But if you are gonna take the chance to watch this shit please do it illegally and download cause you're better off going to prison than watching or paying to watch this shit. The opening scene gives off the appearance of a semi decent film, then it turns into high school fuckin' musical where the film decides to revolve around a group of whiney ass teens. As if we thought teen horror couldn't get any worse huh? Of course with the group of teens we have guess who????? Token the corny black guy who they clearly show has brass knuckles and says the most unusual line after being punked out by the school jock "I'd like to put a chainsaw through his face" or something like that. Guess what???? HE GET'S TOO. Now that would work in a comedy cause it'd be a joke, but come on now a serious horror flick? It gets better, one of the worse and yet memorable scenes is the post party scene where one of the girls is still trapped in the house and being chased by a zombie, her lil group of friends run into the house being chased by a horde of zombies, struggle to keep the door closed, see the girl and the one zombie following her and exit through the same door they entered and we just struggling to keep closed from a horde of dead. Okay again if this were a comedy it would be funny. But this were meant to be a serious film, and if it were meant to be comedy it still failed. Trust me you can get your fix of gore anywhere else cause there isnt much to be impressed by here. The fetus scene i thought was kinda cool, kind caught me off guard in the first place seeing that it's mind you a prego in a party were ppl are smoking and drinking and so on, who mind you doesn't look to prego to begin with, who is suddenly attacked by the one and only zombie there, which sure in a party of about 30 ppl jocks included you would think maybe someone would've had the balls to fight that one zombie off after the first attack but no they all run. Another memorable and bad scene, the city sequence. We all love suspense and build ups and such cause it keeps us watching. But if this scene we trying to achieve that it failed. For us that have seen many a zombie film, we all know once it hits a city are it'll spread out like a plague and chaos would be everywhere so on and so forth. Not here, the city is quiet, clean, and not a single soul nor zombie in sight. That is until our group of protagonist stop and get out of the vehicle and suddenly a group of zombies come from the direction the just came from. Funny,huh? You think they'd be driving around one minute saying "there's something wrong where is everyone" to "hey there's ppl behind us i see them in the review mirror". But then again it's only a movie no one can spot a huge flaw like where the hell did a horde of undead just suddenly emerge from when they should of seen the bastards in the city roaming freely in the first place. "IT'S A FUCKING CITY WHERE'S THE CHAOS" Another shitty scene, when they decide to gather into the high school, yes the school. Seems like a good idea, until the find out the school had been thwarted with the undead as well, who mind you are mostly laying around on the gym floor and in the most predictable of manners sequentially rise. WTF? How can you can more original than that right? Bull shit fucking ass raping donkey dick sucking puss fucks. Another amazingly bad error -seeing this film itself is the worst error of all- is when the explanation come in, it seems the town were there as a government experiment or something, because the government wanted to raise the dead to life in order to have the undead legion fight the wars for the living so we don't lose any of our own. See that i like, "WHEN I SAW THE FIRST TIME IN RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD" All and all do yourself the favor dont watch it, i mean hell some like it and it may be your type of flick but, the script is unintelligible, the cinematography a la 28 days is excruciatingly bad, the acting.... the character development? i can go on. Trust the majority, don't watch. Unless of course you only have a choice of this and house of the dead then i say watch this 50 times over any one of Uwe Bowel's film. Yes i meant to spell it like that. So it shows this isn't the worst flm but still pretty bad, after all i think they worst movie i've ever seen i'd leave nameless =cough cough Tower of blood cough cough= well wether you agree or not this is y review :-P


Posted By: megz333 at 11:54am, May 22, 2008

I thought it was ok. yea so it looked low budget and bad acting but the gore was fantastic. i love that kind of stuff!!!! it turns me on!!! ~*~megan~*~


Posted By: bizkette at 2:16pm, May 20, 2008

*smacks Mr. Disgusting on the nose with a rolled up newspaper*
NO! That's a bad mr. disgusting... you do not give crap movies a review that good...I said NO! *smack*

Waste of time... waste of money... the only clever and redeeming thing was the baby eating scene... and even that was just worth a chuckle or two... such crap...



Posted By: graves007 at 10:45pm, May 16, 2008

Looked low budget, acting sucked across the board, remedial dialogue, shitty make-up/special FX, editing sucked...actually the best part of this film was when it finally ended, and even that was a lunchbag letdown. I guess they couldnt think of a plausible conclusion so they just decided to stop filming and go back to the writing board to finish it.

Don't waste your time.



Posted By: sickness84 at 2:50am, May 8, 2008

First off, this movie sucked more wieners than a gay porno. The hero of the movie was a black guy... ha ha ha, last time I checked it wasn't about a slam dunk contest. The only thing stupider than this movie is my dumb ass for paying 12 bucks for it. Somebody owes me money!


Posted By: alukah at 1:37am, May 8, 2008

For a low budget film, this was alright. The gore was pretty awesome, and some of the zombie makeup was excellent.

However.

Aside from the special effects, there was nothing amazing about Automaton Transfusion. The story was dry and poorly written. The acting was horrible. Most of all, however, the camera work was really, really bad. I can not stress this enough. The quality of the shots looked like someone with a Sony handycam had worked on the project. The shots were extremely jerky, but not in a good "Cloverfield" or "Blair Witch Project" sort of way. I thought the DVD was skipping for most of the beginning of the film.

Over all: This movie had potential for greatness, but fell short due to shoddy camera work, bad acting, and a poorly conceived plot. If you are going to see this film, watch it for the over-the-top low budget gore and soundtrack. I think there were two good songs.



Posted By: walrus60 at 11:32pm, May 5, 2008

Completely amazing for such a low budget film. Though the cameras were pretty crappy they were used very well and gave off a very unique and intense filming style. Special effects were fantastic also, this is one of the most brutal movies I've ever seen and it kicked ass all the way through. Only bad things about the movie were the acting and the title, but what can you expect from a low budget horror film? Anyways, independant filmmakers should definately watch this just to see how far good cinematography and special effects can take you.


Posted By: downward_spiral at 7:57pm, May 4, 2008

OMG this movie sucks so much ass. I dont even wanna talk about it anymore. I had such high hopes for this one but it was such a let down.


Posted By: SAWgirl7 at 12:10pm, April 26, 2008

Don't waste your time. The movie was low budget and it showed. The money shots were not well done nor did they have the right timing.


Posted By: MyOwnAutopsy at 6:49am, April 14, 2008

There were some small details that were very good about this movie. Such as the fact that I know the next two sequels could probably not be as bad as this one. Therefore I will not be watching those. Here are the problems I have with this movie. Yea the special effects were pretty sweet for their budget. That acting was fu**ing trash. They should have actually tried the actors out before hand. (pissed of token black guy with brass knuckles or your overly obnoxious dying teacher that screams like an infant that needs the tit) My biggest problem with this movie was the fact that......

*******SPOILER ALERT*******

They finally get to a slightly entertaining part of the movie and it says to be continued.....

Is this an afternoon fu**ing special on the Disney channel? Oh because I thought I paid good money to see a movie and not some stupid scene kid festival with no ending. It is 1/3 of a movie.....it should have been 1/3 the price.
It is 1/3 as good as the Bloody-Disgusting quote on the front says it is. Fu** this stupid movie in its stupid a**. It was a disgrace to zombie movies.

Note to the Writer/Director: Better actors, better script, better gore, no wierd screaming noises when a zombie gets pissed and if you were trying to make a funny zombie film....take some notes from Braindead(Dead Alive).
- MyOwnAutopsy
www.myspace.com/excarnate



Posted By: tek8738 at 8:48pm, April 13, 2008

Great zombie movie, great low budget film.
The only thing I didn't like is the little title card at the ending, nobody likes endings like that (but I guess that'll be remedied by the sequel)



Posted By: XIØN at 5:19am, April 6, 2008

There is going to be a sequel.
This movie rocked!



Posted By: happy Horror Hard On at 9:33am, March 19, 2008

If i had bough this direct form Stephen Miller's website i would have been stoked. As this has been given a release form DIMENSION EXTREME and hyped as the next big independent feature i was disappointed. I hated the SCREAM-esque high school stuff and the exposition for the existence of the zombies. From the characters emergence from the garage tooled up to the ending it's pretty good but a bit of a drag until you get there. I'd still watch the sequel as i think Miller will learn a lot on his next feature.


Posted By: Joshuaalt at 2:47pm, March 15, 2008

When I bought this film I originally thought that BusyBuy was selling it for $4.99 so I thought what the hell. I get to the regester and buy the film and a few other it's. Unknowingly, I paid $14.99, the one had faded from the tag. Once again I said what the hell. I watch the film and found it ok but not worth the money. I loved the gore, still could have been more. The acting was over the top but managable.

~~~Spoiler~~~

The draw back is at the end, "To Be Continued..." there is know ending.



Posted By: lovesand wants zombies 86 at 12:27am, March 14, 2008

i loved the movie. it was excellent for an independant film. insense, extremely creative. the only this that was aggravating was the end....does any one know if they are actually making another?

get back to me



THE HORROR HYPE METER
Excited to see this movie? Rate it here!

   1 Star

2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars

Total Votes:

Average Rating:

441


HORROR NEWS
Main
DVD
Indie
Video Games
Comic Books
MOVIES
Reviews
Coming Soon
Trailers
Movie Pit
FEATURES
Interviews
Articles
Podcasts
Dead Pixels
Graphic Content
COMMUNITY
My Profile
The Infected
Forums
Blogs
Galleries
ABOUT US
BD Staff
Contact Us
News Feeds
Advertise

BLOODYDISGUSTING.COM/BLOODY-DISGUSTING.COM, GOHORRORMOVIES.COM © 2001-2008 BLOODY-DISGUSTING LLC - Privacy Policy - Terms Of Service
SITE BY KILLROBOT