Need an Account? Sign Up
 

The Hills Have Eyes 2

Release Date: March 23, 2007
Director: Marton Weisz
Writer: Alex Aja, Wes Craven, Jonathan Craven
Starring: Jessica Stroup Reshad Strik Michael McMillian Daniella Alonso Lee Thompson Young Ben Crowley Eric Edelstein Michael Bailey Smith David Reynolds Derek Mears Tyrell Kemlo Javier Nieto Gáspár Szabó Jeff Kober Jay Acovone Archie Kao Philip Pav
Studio: Fox Atomic
Rating: R
Official Site: Click Here

Official Score


Average User Rating


Read 60 User Reviews


You have to be logged in to comment!
If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.


USERNAME:
PASSWORD:




Posted By: Mrmcd666 at 4:55pm, November 2, 2009

Just bad which is a shame because the remake was great.


Posted By: nelmes69 at 6:02am, September 17, 2009

Forget anything about plot or story structure. This film is all about the gore! The action is fast and furious, the body count is high and the violence is extreme! There is one kill that is groin grabbling painful to watch. Yes its utterly ridiculous but thats what makes it fun.


Posted By: trickytreats at 6:29pm, September 16, 2009

It was as if they gave no thought at all to this remake but instead just threw together the plot at the last second. Don't waste your time with this one.


Posted By: Bostic101 at 6:06am, September 13, 2009

This film was terrible in my opinon. I remember waiting for it to come out and when i saw it i couldn't believe what i paid for. Maybe a movie rental but not worthy of owning.


Posted By: LuJr81 at 2:33am, September 12, 2009

While obviously this film wasn't better than Alex Aja's Remake, it was still pretty entertaining to me. There were some cool gory moments and the acting while bad wasn't atrocious. Defintely worth a look if your a gore hound.


Posted By: LuJr81 at 2:33am, September 12, 2009

While obviously this film wasn't better than Alex Aja's Remake, it was still pretty entertaining to me. There were some cool gory moments and the acting while bad wasn't atrocious. Defintely worth a look if your a gore hound.


Posted By: BloodCount at 11:30am, September 7, 2009

It was a really bad movie but still a bit entertaining if you don't have anything else to do. If you compare it to the first one from 2006 and the original from 1977(That doesnt seem to have any page on this site! Shame on you Bloody Disgusting!) this movie is complete crap.

The mutants almost look the same all of them. They are not as creative as the ones in the fisrt film thats for sure. Still it is a bit entertaining so 3/10.



Posted By: maynardmorrissey at 6:39pm, September 6, 2009

nothing to get excited about, but it has its moments


Posted By: groundgamer at 7:04am, August 23, 2009

The first was great, but this wasn't so good. The Hills Have Eyes 2 is set in the same place as the first, with a similar plot and some re - cycled ideas. But, The Hills Have Eyes 2 is a gory as hell slasher movie, but doesn't do enough to get a great score. It isn't that scary, but has some jumps in there to make you look away, but again, nothing that special. The make up effects of the canibals are basically the same, with some obvious mistakes in there, but, it trys hard enough to provide good entertainment.

Overall, a gory as hell horror movie, but just not enough to make it better than the first. But, roll on the third!

6/10



Posted By: AvoidTheCheese at 11:47am, August 17, 2009

portapotty jack in the box man and slimy tounge deepthroat rape ways give this abused hooker of a film two stars for them two things mentioned but even at that don't see this piece of old hardened cake that's been in the fridge since last Thanksgiving.


Posted By: bloodnguts313 at 3:58pm, August 14, 2009

This is a very good horror movie. If you wanna get scared then c this movie. Its 1 of the most disturbing movies ive ever seen. Idk if its better than the first but its very close. Very gory and bloody and disturbing.


Posted By: !!rogue!! at 5:35pm, July 31, 2009

one of the worst movies i've ever seen.


Posted By: horrorbuff28 at 8:22pm, July 25, 2009

this movie was godawful.
i hated this movie with a passion.
totally offensive in every way possible.
wasnt scary, just a waste of time.



Posted By: bunnyracer420 at 12:31pm, June 15, 2009

This movie was more funny than scary. didnt like the whole military thing, but the "monsters"/"inbred folk" were cool.

"Make Baby" had me rolling!



Posted By: MGM at 5:31pm, May 20, 2009

just crap


Posted By: Remember Slithis? at 9:50pm, May 12, 2009

Terrible acting,descent gore,snuff film, Ewe Boll could of made a better sequel,Epic failure.


Posted By: Mango13 at 9:44pm, May 12, 2009

I haven't seen the first one,but I heard it's better than this.
I didn't really like it. It was boring but i guess it's because I wasn't paying attention but when I was it was bad. Exept some parts.

2/10



Posted By: Truhorrur at 3:38pm, April 18, 2009

hahaha man i was so looking forward to this. but what a disappointment, the worst piece of shit film ive seen in the past 10 years. not one redeeming quality to this garbage. worst acting, worst death scenes and a loveable down syndrome mutant like goonies?????? wtf!!! wes craven should denounce this and say they drugged him and faked his signature to greenlight this insult to horror.


Posted By: caseynight88 at 6:50pm, April 11, 2009

Godawful... There's nothing else to describe this wretched suckquel other than that word. Can't believe Wes Craven is responsible for this abomination.


Posted By: kryptonite_soul at 6:13pm, March 21, 2009

good better than the BD review gave it credit for not as great as the first movie, but certainly not a bad movie and not worth the criticism it recieves


Posted By: randomrick at 8:48pm, March 10, 2009

it was what it was a movie about desert freaks.


Posted By: horrorking95 at 8:51am, February 21, 2009

The first half an hour was great it was gory and fun but the next half wasn't very good. The soldiers decided to go to in the tunnel where you cant see a thing! You couldn't see what was going on! Thats what spoiled it. The Hills Have Eyes 1 is a lot better just watch that and don't bother with this one its a rip off
**
Out Of
*****



Posted By: billbeast at 9:28pm, February 20, 2009

OK. Although I would've preferred the original plot of Brenda Carter joinging the army, and going back, her actress Emilie De Raven was to busy shooting "Lost" to join this cast. The movie was ok to watch but, is no where near as great as its preceeder. The plot was crap, with the mutants now living in the mountains, not in the mines, what the hell?.

The plot was stupid because the mutants are different characters, they live in the mountains now and not in the mines, unless this is a different part of the Sector, but I don't care.

The acting was ok, with Jessica Stroup stealing the limelight as the strong newcomber to the force.

Overall "The Hills Have Eyes 2" is not a great sequel but an allright movie by itself. My rating is 3/5



Posted By: Malcolm T Grindhouse at 12:40pm, February 19, 2009

This movie had verry little ties to the previous film. Witch maybe the problem with the film to alot of you people. I knew what I was getting into when I first saw the movie the film was exactly what I thought it was going to be less plot more violence. Also their was no returning cast members. This movie is esentually a B movie but a entertaining one at that. Although a contination of the preious film could have been interesting.


Posted By: GRUDGE4life at 3:58pm, January 21, 2009

once again who let the idiots of the world rate this movie? this movie had good acting, a good plot, and good gore to top it off. sometimes i think there are no horror fans on this website just horror critics


Posted By: .::DyingBreed::. at 8:08pm, January 20, 2009

I thought the first was a hell of a lot better then this one.but i still enjoyed it


Posted By: SamuelRisenhoover at 11:55am, December 10, 2008

Just average... this could have been a lot better had it not been for the incorporation of such an unrealistic bunch of marines. Aja's is far superior and should definately be viewed before this cluncker


Posted By: rusted31 at 2:14am, December 10, 2008

Complete rubbish. You think being written by Wes Craven and his son it would have been decent but no, a complete travesty. The dialouge was well, dire , no suspense and totally boring . The rape scene towards the end was utterly disgusting. Dont bother, watch the Aja once instead, far superior.


Posted By: Sickness77 at 8:33pm, December 9, 2008

Honestly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It lacked everything that made the first one so good. The first one was really horrifying, as was its remake but this one was a blatant attempt at targeting the less than dedicated fans of this genre who may not know any better than to avoid at all costs movies where the original director has jumped ship. The first scene really had me sucked in, only to let me down more than I though possible. The scares were predictable if not tacky, (the porta potty scene). The mistakes were so numerous, I found myself getting distracted completely from the movie. The only bad thing about putting the military into movies is that they are hardly ever accurately portrayed. For another awful example, see the remake of Day of the Dead, the one with Nick Cannon. Overall, a terrible movie and I will always regret those 90 mins misspent.


Posted By: tom holiday at 6:56pm, December 9, 2008

I think the movie was pritty bad. I liked the idea of them going into the caves. But it fell way short. I was looking forward to being as good as the remake. But sadly it didn't deliver. Maybe will see better work from gorge romero in the future.


Posted By: BK's Finest at 3:09pm, December 9, 2008

I've seen a lot worst....


Posted By: strangeland8 at 1:28pm, December 9, 2008

Was not a huge fan of this movie. I thought the first was a hell of a lot better then this one. The rape scene disturbed me a lot


Posted By: Vasquez at 12:46pm, December 9, 2008

Not nearly as bad as the BD review makes out... jesus. It had terrible friggin acting (funny so) but the death scenes were pretty creative and alot of fun and its always fun seeing those whacked mutants again. And + isent a movie like this meant for the kills?? How cool and unique can we get?? -- that being said the first one And the original were far better :-)


Posted By: babagloom at 6:59pm, December 8, 2008

Rather rub poo in my eyes than see this again. On the same level of bad as Wes Craven's sequel.


Posted By: CALVAIRE at 2:52pm, November 4, 2008

Writing credits: Wes Craven (written by) & Jonathan Craven (written by)Wes Craven (characters)...call me crazy but I've heard Alex Ala having anything to do with this sequel and you guys have him down as a writer.



Posted By: zackawii at 11:48am, November 4, 2008

The movie opened amazingly but it was a steep drop off from there.
At times, unintentionally funny.
Drowning in shit?
Really?
The mutants were fun and nice to look at and all the kills weren't THAT bad but the human characters were just boring and unlikeable.
Also, nothing shocking.
At least the remake could boast it had the infamous trailer rape scene.
This one has little to offer compared to its predecessor.



Posted By: sweetestsadist at 10:05pm, October 25, 2008

I like this movie for one reason. If you work at a job where you have to change the cherry syrup bags on a frozen drink machine, you can reenact the opening scene. Freakin' great. One star bonus for that.


Posted By: dherna7704 at 12:35pm, October 9, 2008

sure the plot is dumb and the dioluge but i sure had fun watchin people and mutants die


Posted By: walrus60 at 12:36am, October 8, 2008

Badass movie. Sure the dialogue was terrible and some of the actors were pretty bad, but it was well directed and had some excellent gore. Don't expect to take this movie very seriously, just have fun with it


Posted By: Protecious at 2:15pm, September 30, 2008

Nowhere compares to the remake one, although the idea of going mostly into the mines was good because there isnt much you can do with the desert mutants and what not. I think a third should be made, direct to dvd, and i think it should focus on the remaining mutants completely running out of human food and fighting each other and killing each other off.



Posted By: HorrorDefender at 8:56pm, August 22, 2008

The remake was one of the greatest movies ever made and some people might hate for this but it was better than the original yep i said it. And the sequel well it was not as good as the original but we got a fun ride filled with blood and gore so what do people want from wes craven. Sure the mutants looked a bit like retards because the ones from the original were really smart and fucking scary and the story of this one wasnt very original but there were lots of killings and the soldiers were a bit smart but sometimes cliche and i think the poster was creepie like the original i couldnt stop laughing when a guy appears from the toilet and the other guy scream shit man! so dont be so harsh and just enjoy.


Posted By: badboyrsl at 1:48pm, August 7, 2008

Not as good as the first one but it does a good job with the gore. The intro scene was gross and locked me in for the rest of the movie.


Posted By: jako at 10:48am, August 2, 2008

It was a pretty entertaining hollywood flik


Posted By: Anthropophagus at 5:27am, August 2, 2008

While the original remake was terrible, it still had coherence to a plot, which is something this film has never heard of. An utterly laughable and embarrasingly bad film. The plot is as deformed as the mutants, the characters are carboard props who serve no purpose other than to get hacked to pieces and whose vocabulary ranges from "shit" to "fuck". Terrible film, but the original remake really isn't all that much better, and gore-wise, I actually enjoyed this film a lot more.


Posted By: gravija at 2:17am, August 2, 2008

The first one was awful enough to have put me off seeing a sequel indefinitely. However, I was trying to find a movie to fall asleep to one night and this happened to be on HBO at like 1 a.m. Sure enough, it put me to sleep. There's just something dull about this, unoriginal and completely pointless. Worse than the first by a great deal and even if I hadn't actually anticipated seeing it, I wish it had been a bit more interesting.

Though maybe I'm being too harsh as I didn't see the entire thing. I fell asleep halfway through.



Posted By: rockzhard at 1:23am, August 2, 2008

not the worst movie i've seen, but damn sure not the best.


Posted By: DiegOmen16 at 4:20pm, July 27, 2008

GOOD AND FUN MOVIE but not as good as the original and some people must stop throwing crap at this movie it was good ok end of the story so stop bitchin about it


Posted By: Repo!Screams at 10:00pm, July 19, 2008

People that rated this movie up,seriously, like seriously. This movie was complete and utter crap. The acting and everything. Horrible crap!

The only reason I'm giving it a full skull is because the weird deformed people looked pretty cool I guess. But thats the only reason.



Posted By: TheDeadMayTasteBad at 5:19pm, July 19, 2008

"'The Hills Have Eyes 2' is a horror picture about a group of national guard rookies fighting what appears to be cave trolls. The movie starts with a birth-giving scene and contains one and a half rape sequence. That's all you have to know about the plot.

Horrible, cliché ridden and predictable script with dull conversations, bad to mediocre directing and gaping logic holes, racist stereotype characters and monsters that look like trolls from a straight to DVD fantasy movie, rather than mutated freaks, make this movie already a terrible mess when finally a guest appearance of "Sloth" from "The Goonies" hands it the final blow, turning it ultimately hilarious albeit in a tragic kind of way. What's almost as annoying as the cheesy dialogs and terribly bad monster costumes is the CONSTANT use of jump scares at blatantly obvious moments, making them obsolete and lose all the impact they might have had if a more skilled director would have placed them at least a bit more carefully.

Overall this movie is terrible and shouldn't be watched by anyone. " --Captain-Spaulding, imdb.com



Posted By: Lyssa284225 at 9:11pm, July 17, 2008

This movie was awesome....!


Posted By: Slayer6(sic)6 at 9:37pm, July 11, 2008

Loved it...


Posted By: thedescent08 at 10:05pm, June 26, 2008

meh


Posted By: PromNight2008 at 7:58pm, May 21, 2008

I honestly did not like this at all. I was incredibly disappointed after the great, GREAT original movie (erm... can it really be called an "original" movie?). This is truly awful.


Posted By: Butterkeuh at 7:05am, May 20, 2008

good movie !!!


Posted By: downward_spiral at 3:48pm, May 8, 2008

More messed up then the first one. Most people didnt like it but I thought it was really good. Acting was really bad though. I mean "Shit Man the Barbarian", who comes up with that shit.


Posted By: alecelmboy at 3:37pm, April 28, 2008

It was pretty damn good.


Posted By: MyOwnAutopsy at 6:33am, April 14, 2008

I am not one that is into all the politics or military mumbo jumbo but come on. They actually tried to pull it off. I rented this and I am so glad I didn't buy it. I would have felt almost as dumb as the time I watched the first Hills Have Eyes. Which brings me to my next point....remakes are most likely going to be garbage unless Tom Savini has something to do with it. He should have helped the Cravens out a little, it might not have been this big of a steaming pile of sh**. Speaking of sh**....
the Porto-potty scene was funny, thats it......this one is for the garbage can or you could be more creative than the writing staff and use this disc as a frisbee or coaster for your drink.- MyOwnAutopsy
www.myspace.com/excarnate



Posted By: GGoblin31 at 10:29am, March 18, 2008

Awful. Awful. Awful. Can you believe that TWO Cravens (father & son) hatched this on us? The parallels to the Iraq War are laughable and disrespectful. A flacid attempt to keep a lame-ass franchise afloat. A few good kills here and there, but as a whole this cannibal snuff-fest is a miserable experience. Avoid like the plague.


Posted By: rancid rawness at 1:10pm, March 17, 2008

I actually enjoyed this flick. I found the plot rather thin but there was plenty of drama and "mucho mutant mayhem" !


Posted By: leatherfacekillserinfan1 at 9:06am, March 1, 2008

an all right movie. better than the 1985 version but no where near as good as the remake. thhe2 would have been better if Aja stayed. some parts of the movie were violent and bloody. i liked this when i first saw it but after that nope. the movie wasn't a huge dissapointment but could have been alot better. they could have waited for Aja to finish P2 b4 they started making the movie. Aja made the 1st awesome and could made this one awesomer.



THE HORROR HYPE METER
Excited to see this movie? Rate it here!

   1 Star

2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars

Total Votes:

Average Rating:

2334




BD NEWS

Main
DVD
Indie
Video Games
Comic Books
MOVIES

Reviews
Coming Soon
Trailers
Movie Pit
FEATURES

Interviews
Articles
Podcasts
Dead Pixels
Graphic Content
COMMUNITY

My Profile
The Infected
Forums
Blogs
Galleries
ABOUT

BD Staff
Contact Us
News Feeds
Advertise

BLOODYDISGUSTING.COM/BLOODY-DISGUSTING.COM, GOHORRORMOVIES.COM © 2001-2008 BLOODY-DISGUSTING LLC - Privacy Policy - Terms Of Service