You have to be logged in to comment! If you don't have an account register now for free! Your account allows you to post comments and reviews, upload videos and images, access or our forums, write personal blogs, and maintain your profile.
This is no where near as good as the first, but still remains as a good follow up to the great, scary as hell White Noise. This basic plotted, badly acted sequel is similar to the first, with a small twist that isn't to get excited about. Again, as the first, it's pretty scary at points, with some jumpy moments. The CGI is great too, but nothing much more is really going with this film. The acting is horrible compared with the first. But, it is a jumpy horror, and for that I give it the good ole' middle rating.
I did like it, even though I haven't seen the first one. Lots of jumpy bits, would recommend watching it.
Posted By: horrorfan25 at 11:49am, November 23, 2008
I actually liked White noise even though everybody didn't like it. Now I see the White noise series should end. The sequel wasn't the worst I've seen but I was expecting a lot out of it. I agree the story line was good in this case and we had some decent scares but nothing to jump out of your seat scary or nothing exciting like the original. Overall White noise 2: The light has some decent moments but you'll expect a lot more when the credits roll. I hope Patrick Lussier owes us with My bloody valentine 3-D.
This movie far surpassed the original in quality. I don't understand how this site gave it a low rating whereas the other one got a decent one.
The acting in this film was far better, as well as having a much more coherent storyline and plot. It was executed well and did not leave any gaps by the end. I think that most of the negative attention this movie was spurned from the fact that the first one was so bad, and that it was a sequel.
If you look at this movie objectively; forgetting that sequels are often bad and that the first film was a drop dead fail (which obviously, the reviewer did not), it gives us a much more plausible plot line and a much more interesting story overall.
Recieves a 7/10 for me. I was very impressed.
Posted By: stewietantrum at 3:21am, October 20, 2008
Even though this sequel had almost nothing to do with the first film, it wasn't bad. It wasn't good either, but at least I didn't feel like I'd completely wasted my time.
better than the first this is a movie that with a better budget could have been something better maybe emotional story but blaaa
Posted By: Protecious at 12:39pm, September 30, 2008
ill be one of the few people to defend this movie and state it's much better and more interesting, and entertaining than the original, but that's my opinion, this film was more along the lines of the frighteners minus the comedy, than it was white noise, i felt it kept my interest, acting wasnt bad, the plot was interesting and good enough to wonder what was going to be hapenning next, a surprise to me because most direct to dvd movies arent good, but this is one of the few, with feast probably being the best direct to dvd horror film ever.
